IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
PARTHIVJYOTISAIKIA, J.
Porishmita Baishya Phukan @ Porishmita Phukan W/O Robin Phukan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam – Respondent
Bail Appln. 3105 of 2024, Bail Appln.2984 of 2024
Decided on : 13-11-2024
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 108 and 45 - Bail applications filed under Section 483 for petitioners arrested in connection with alleged abetment of suicide - Court emphasized that mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for abetment; direct acts of incitement must be proven. (Paras 21-36)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners accused of abetting the suicide of a public servant, Debajit Hazarika, who left behind suicide notes implicating them.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioners no longer deserved detention and allowed bail.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners' actions constituted abetment of suicide.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that to establish abetment, there must be clear evidence of instigation or encouragement leading to the suicide.
Result: Bail applications allowed.
JUDGMENT :
PARTHIVJYOTISAIKIA, J.
These two bail applications are filed under Section 483 of the BNSS of 2023 whereby the petitioners Smti. Porishmita Baishya Phukan @ Porishmita Phukan and Shri Dulal Bora who were arrested in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.112/2024 have prayed for releasing them on bail.
2. Heard Mr. B.K. Mahajan and Mr. S.N. Tamuli, the learned counsels appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M. Phukan, the learned Public Prosecutor, Assam.
3. Late Debajit Hazarika was the President of Rajapukhuri Gaon Panchayat. On 15.07.2024, the petitioner Dulal Bora wrote letters to the the Governor of Assam; Chief Executive Officer, Charaideo Zila Parishad and to the Principal Secretary of Panchayat & Rural Development, Government of Assam at Guwahati wherein he alleged irregularities in construction of Raidongia Devitukura Hari Mandir. It was alleged that in the financial year 2021-22, an amount of Rs.2,16,500/-was sanctioned for construction of the said Mandir under Rajapukhuri Gaon Panchayat. He further alleged that somebody had misappropriated the aforesaid money. In order to show the Mandir was under construction, some photographs were uploaded in the Mera Panchayat Application. Sri Dulal Bora has alleged that those photographs were not of the Mandir but of the house built by late Debajit Hazarika. According to Dulal Bora, by uploading fake photographs, Rs.2,16,500/-was misappropriated.
4. On the basis of the said applications filed by Sri Dulal Bora, the Chief Executive Officer, Charaideo Zila Parishad wrote a letter to the Block Development Officer, Sonari, directing him/her to lodge an FIR against late Debajit Hazarika and all other persons allegedly involved in misappropriation of public funds in construction of Hari Mandir at Devitukurachuk under Rajapukhuri Gaon Panchayat.
5. Accordingly, the Block Development Officer, Sonari, lodged an FIR before Officer-in-Charge, Sonari Police Station requesting him to carry out an inquiry against late Debajit Hazarika, former President Rajapukhuri Gaon Panchayat and all other persons involved in misappropriation of money in construction of the aforesaid Hari Mandir.
6. Thereafter, on 20.09.2024, late Debajit Hazarika committed suicide by hanging. On the same day, his wife Mousumi Likson Hazarika lodged an FIR before police alleging that her deceased husband was threatened and mentally tortured by some prominent people by spreading false news on social media and newspapers. She alleged that the said acts were done just to tarnish the image of her deceased husband. Mrs. Hazarika states that her husband left behind a suicide note wherein he had mentioned the names of Sri Ranjit Borgohain (Ex-Block Development Officer), Md. Rafik Ahmed (Journalist, News Live), Smti. Porishmita Phukan (Journalist) and Shri Dulal Bora (RTI Activist). The complainant Smti. Hazarika has accused those persons that for their acts, her husband had to commit suicide.
7. Late Hazarika left behind two suicide notes containing about 26 pages. One was written while he was in Nepal where he had gone to receive treatment of his eyes. This note does not contain any date, but the other note was written on 18.09.2024.
8. The gist of the undated letter shows that he was interested in public service since his childhood. He was an Office Bearer of the NE School where he studied. In the High School also, he was the Assistant General Secretary. When he was in Class-XI, he was the General Secretary. Subsequently, in Sapekheti area, he was the Office Bearer of All Assam Students Union in different capacities. He was the youngest Executive Member of the students union in the district of Sivasagar. He never earned any bad reputation as a student leader. Later on, by paying bribe, he became an officer of a company. For paying the bribe, he had to sell the ornaments of his wife. He was maintaining good relationship with highly placed people and therefore, he used to give electricity connections to some people who actu
Gangula Mohan Reddy vs The State of Andhra Pradesh
To establish abetment of suicide, there must be clear evidence of instigation or encouragement leading to the act, not mere allegations of harassment.
Non-payment of dues alone does not constitute abetment of suicide under IPC without clear evidence of instigation or overt acts by the accused.
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or intent to drive the deceased to suicide; mere harassment is insufficient.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a proximate and live link between alleged instigation or illegal acts and the subsequent suicide, the absence of mens rea and po....
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or direct involvement by the accused, and mere relationship discord is insufficient to constitute a....
The court emphasized that to establish abetment of suicide, the prosecution must demonstrate mens rea, showing direct or indirect acts leading the victim to suicide, and mere harassment is insufficie....
To convict under Section 306 IPC, clear, proximate acts of instigation by the accused must be proved, lacking mere allegations of harassment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.