IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Shri Jitender Sah S/o Mangal Sah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent
Bail Appln./23/2024
Decided on : 13-12-2024
(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22, 27A, 29(1) - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 3(5) - Bail application - Accused-petitioner sought bail in connection with trafficking of contraband - No contraband recovered from accused-petitioner - Investigation ongoing, no prima facie case established against accused-petitioner - Court emphasized stringent conditions under Section 37 of NDPS Act for granting bail - Accused-petitioner allowed bail on specific conditions. (Paras 11, 12, 22, 23)
JUDGMENT :
The present application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [‘the BNSS, 2023’, for short] is preferred by the accused-petitioner viz. Sri Jitender Sah seeking his release on bail in connection with Special Case no. 37 of 2024, arising out of South Police Station Kohima Case no. 34/2024. The crime case, South Police Station Kohima Case no. 34/2024 has been registered for the offences under Sections 22/27A/29[1] of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [‘the NDPS Act’, for short] read with Section 3[5] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [‘the BNS 2023’, for short].
2. On 22.07.2024, on the basis of Suo Moto First Information Report [FIR] lodged by one Ketoulikho Ngukha, ABSI before the Officer In-Charge, South Police Station Kohima, the crime case, South Police Station Kohima Case no. 30/2024 came to be registered for the offences under Section 27[a][b]/21[a] of the NDPS Act r/w Section 35 of the BNS, 2023. In the said FIR, it was alleged that on 22.07.2024, a combined team of Police personnel of South Police Station Kohima apprehended 3 [three] persons from New Police Reserve, Phesama along with suspected heroin powder. From the possession of the 3 [three] apprehended accused persons viz. [i] Manjoi Salim; [ii] Longtilong Longkumer; and [iii] Imlimanen Aier, suspected heroin powder weighing [0.76 grams + 0.25 grams + 0.55 grams + 0.77 grams = 2.33 grams] were recovered. In connection with the said South Police Station Kohima Case no. 30/2024, the present accused-petitioner and one Jhunu Kumar were also arrested.
3. When the present accused-petitioner and Jhunu Kumar were in custody in connection with South Police Station Kohima Case no. 30/2024, the present accused-petitioner and Jhunu Kumar were shown arrested in connection with another case, South Police Station Kohima Case no. 34/2024 registered on 03.08.2024, based on an FIR lodged by one Sri Sobu Rengma, an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police attached to South Police Station Kohima and the Investigating Officer [I.O.] of the case, South Police Station Kohima Case no. 30/2024.
4. In the FIR lodged by Sri Sobu Rengma, ASI, it is inter-alia stated that while he was investigating South Police Station Kohima Case no. 30/2024, necessary leads from reliable sources were received with regard to involvement of the present accused-petitioner as the main trafficker and supplier of the contraband. Based on such source, necessary investigation was taken up and the mobile number of suspect, that is, the present accused-petitioner was identified. Legal interception of the mobile conversations of the present accused-petitioner was found necessitated and accordingly, those were obtained. The informant further stated that investigation had established that the present accused-petitioner was directly involved in trafficking of contraband from Manipur to various States of India. The interception revealed that the present accused-petitioner was transporting 100 packets of contraband [Heroin] to Dimapur from an unknown person on 30.07.2024. The informant further mentioned that following the leads, the present accused-petitioner and his accomplice, Jhunu Kumar were located and thereafter, arrested. Police remand was sought for and during their examination, both the present accused-petitioner and his alleged accomplice, Jhunu Kumar revealed certain facts which were not directly involved in the case, South Police Station Kohima Case no. 30/2024, which was being investigated by him.
4.1. The informant in the FIR further alleged that the present accused-petitioner along with his partners, [i] Sri Anil; [ii] Sri Prashant Jaiswal; and [iii] Sri Mani Kumar collected contraband [Heroin - Sunflower] from one lady viz. Ms. Koveni of Kohima and transported them to Dimapur and other parts of the country. The informant stated that the present accused-petitioner stated before him that he along with his partner, Sri Anil purchased 40 soap cases containing
The court emphasized that bail under the NDPS Act requires reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and unlikely to commit further offenses while on bail.
Courts must strictly apply Section 37 of the NDPS Act requiring proof of non-guilt and lack of risk to public safety for bail eligibility.
The court emphasized the stringent conditions imposed by Section 37 of the NDPS Act for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantity of contraband, highlighting the need for reasonable ground....
The court denied bail under the NDPS Act due to the serious nature of drug trafficking charges and failure to meet statutory conditions, emphasizing public safety and legislative intent.
The court emphasized the mandatory conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for granting bail, requiring reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and assurance against further of....
The judgment establishes the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy reasonable grounds for believing in the innocence of the accused and ensuring t....
The court held that bail cannot be granted under the NDPS Act without satisfying the statutory requirements of demonstrating that the accused is not guilty of the offence and is unlikely to commit fu....
NDPS Section 37 mandates twin conditions for bail in commercial quantity cases: reasonable grounds believing not guilty and unlikely to reoffend. Spot recovery memos signed by accused satisfy grounds....
The court emphasized that under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, bail can only be granted if there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.