VIJAY BISHNOI, SUMAN SHYAM
Saswati Das D/o Haren Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIJAY BISHNOI, C.J.
1. These writ appeals are preferred on behalf of the appellants challenging the judgment & order dated 21.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP (C) No. 3341/2019 (Shalini Khan Vs. State of Assam & Ors.) and WP (C) No. 3344/2019 (Girbani Deka Vs. State of Assam & Ors.) whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petitions filed on behalf of the appellants Shalini Khan (appellant in Writ Appeal No. 361/2023) and Girbani Deka (appellant in Writ Appeal No. 364/2023) and has concluded that as the appellants Shalini Khan and Girbani Deka as well as the appellants Saswati Das (appellant in Writ Appeal No. 363/2023); Vidisha Bodo and Anupam Deka (appellants in Writ Appeal No. 371/2023) and Manish Baruah (appellant in Writ Appeal No. 373/2023) did not qualify in their Preliminary Examination of the Combined Competitive Examination, 2018 (hereinafter to be referred as “CCE, 2018”) no direction can be given to the State Government to consider their cases for appointment to the Civil Services and Civil Posts under the State Government.
2. The undisputed brief facts of the case are that the respondent Assam Public Service Commission (hereinafte
Pankaj Sharma Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors. (2008) 4 SCC 273
Ran Vijay Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2018) 2 SCC 357
The court established that the condition of passing the Preliminary Examination is mandatory, but equitable relief can be granted based on performance in subsequent stages.
As per said 1989 statutory Rules, one of essential conditions is that to be qualified for admission to Main Examination of Combined Competitive Examination, one has to qualify Preliminary Examination....
Public Service Commission - Civil service Examination - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms
The main legal point established is that candidates cannot challenge the lack of reservation benefits after participating in the selection process, and the reservation policy may not apply to the pre....
Supreme Court did not give a blanket order for allowing any candidate to approach the Court for re-evaluation at any point of time and restricted relief to those candidates who had approached the Cou....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.