Back
DEVASHIS BARUAH
UCO BANK – Appellant
Versus
ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
1. Heard Mr. M. Sharma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. B. Choudhury, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent APDCL.
2. The petitioner herein has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court challenging the bill dated 14.03.2019 of an amount of Rs. 5,82,030/- (Rupees Five Lakh Eighty Two Thousand Thirty) as well as the notice dated 04.04.2019. The specific case of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is that all along the bills which have been raised by the Respondent APDCL would show that the maximum consumption of units of the petitioner in a month was 2286. However, for the bill period of 31.10.2018 to 31.12.2018, the unit consumption shown was 61238 and on the basis thereof, a bill was generated of an amount of Rs. 5,34,015/- (Rupees Five Lakh Thirty Four Thousand Fifteen).
3. Mr. M. Sharma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that pursuant to the filing of the instant writ petition the affidavit-in-opposition had been filed wherein the Respondent Authorities have categorically admitted that the meter in question was healthy, and as such, the consump
The obligation to pay electricity charges arises upon issuance of the bill, which constitutes the first due amount, regardless of prior consumption, as per Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2013.
The obligation to pay electricity charges arises upon issuance of a bill, which constitutes the first due, and the limitation period under Section 56(2) does not prevent supplementary demands.
The obligation to pay electricity charges arises upon the issuance of a bill, as clarified under Section 56 of the Electricity Act, allowing supplementary demands beyond the usual limitation period w....
Supplementary bills can be raised for mistakes, but disconnection for non-payment after two years is prohibited under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003.
The court held that a licensee can correct a bona fide mistake in billing even after the two-year limitation period for recovery of dues under Section 56(2) of The Electricity Act, 2003.
The obligation to pay electricity charges arises upon the issuance of the bill, thus supplementary demands can be made regardless of billing errors, provided service is not disconnected for payment f....
The court established that an electricity company can issue revised bills for bona fide mistakes in billing, reinforcing the consumer's obligation to pay based on accurate meter readings.
The error in applying the multiplying factor did not absolve the petitioner from paying the charges, and the respondents were entitled to raise the supplementary demand.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
