IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Kalyan Rai Surana, Marli Vankung, JJ.
Nuru Sikdar – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam and Ors. – Respondents
Crl. A./27/2023
Decided On : 13-05-2024
JUDGMENT :
Kalyan Rai Surana, J.
1. Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the appellant, Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Addl. P.P. for the State and Mr. M. Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 (i.e. informant).
2. This appeal filed under section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. is for assailing the judgment dated 05.12.2022, and sentence dated 03.01.2023, passed by the learned Special Judge, Chirang, Kajalgaon in Spl. POSCO Case No. 4/2020. By the said impugned judgment, the appellant was convicted for committing offence punishable under section 376 of the I.P.C. and section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as "POCSO Act" for brevity) and by the sentence impugned herein, the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 (twenty) years and also to pay a fine of Rs.40,000/-, to be paid to the victim if recovered, and in default to under further rigorous imprisonment for 3 (three) months.
3. In this judgment and order, the name of the then minor victim and the informant are masked to protect their identity and the victim is hereinafter referred to as 'X' and the informant, who is the father of the then minor victim is hereinafter referred to as 'Y'.
4. The prosecution case was set rolling by Y, who had lodged an FIR on 05.01.2020, before the Officer-in-Charge, Basugaon P.S., alleging that on the same day at around 5.00 p.m. when his minor daughter X, who had gone to the nearby field to bring the cattle back, the appellant, who was waiting near his home took the advantage of the absence of any other person there, grabbed his daughter and gagged her and by removing her clothes, took her photographs in his mobile phone and after threatening to tell other persons and send her photographs to other people to defame her, raped her and later, his daughter came home crying and narrated the incident to them. On receipt of the said FIR, Basugaon P.S. Case No. 2/2020 was registered under section 376 IPC read with section 4 of the POCSO Act and the case was assigned to Hare Krishna Kalita, S.I. of Police (PW-4) for investigation.
5. The I.O. had investigated the case, prepared the sketch-map, examined witnesses, seized the photocopy of the birth certificate of X, the victim, and got the victim's statement recorded under section 164 CrPC, collected medical report. On completion of investigation, the I.O. had submitted the charge sheet no. 2/2020 dated 31.01.2020.
6. On 14.03.2022, the learned Special Judge read-over and explained charges to the appellant under section 376(3) IPC read with section 4 of POCSO Act. The appellant denied the charges and claimed to be tried.
7. In course of trial, the prosecution had examined 4 (four) PWs.
b. X, the victim was examined as PW-2. She had exhibited her statement under section 164 CrPC (Ext.P-5); student registration card (Ext.P-6).
c. Dr. Mrs. Dipali Bordoloi Manta was examined as PW-3. She had exhibited radiological report of the victim (Ext.P-5); report of pregnancy test and swab test (Ext.P-6);.
d. Hare Krishna Kalita, I.O. was examined as PW-4. He had exhibited the signature of Harin Chandra Deka, O/c. of Basugaon P.S. [Ext.P- 1(2)] and [Ext.P-2(2)]; prayer for recording statement of victim under section 164 CrPC (Ext.P-6); sketch map (Ext.P-7); charge-sheet (Ext.P- 8). He had also exhibited his signature as Ext.P-4(3), Ext.P-6(1), Ext.P- 7(1), and Ext.P-8(1).
e. The learned Trial Court had examined Resminara Khatun as CW-1, and A (name withheld), the younger sister of victim as CW-2.
8. It may be mentioned that Trial Court Record (TCR for short) contains three documents marked as Ext.6. One is photocopy of Student Registration Card, 2019 issued by the
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and inconsistencies in witness testimonies can lead to acquittal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for clear, consistent, and reliable evidence in cases involving allegations of sexual assault, especially when determining the guil....
Statutorial presumption u/s 29 and 30 of POCSO Act certainly places a persuasive burden on appellant to show that he does not possess requisite culpable mental state for offence for which he is prose....
Point of Law – Kidnapping and abduction – Conviction - victim, who is found to be an unreliable witness - appellant is entitled for benefit of doubt
The judgment establishes the importance of corroborative evidence, the presumption of guilt under the POCSO Act, and the standard of proof required for the accused to prove innocence in cases of sexu....
Conviction of the appellant for attempted aggravated penetrative sexual assault upheld based on consistent testimony of the minor victim, despite charge framing errors; sentence reduced to ten years'....
The competence of child witnesses, scrutiny of hostile witnesses' testimony, and the significance of corroborative evidence and the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act are central legal pri....
The court upheld the conviction based on the credible testimony of the minor victim, emphasizing that minor inconsistencies do not undermine her credibility.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.