SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 207

MANISH CHOUDHURY
Car Servicing Center – Appellant
Versus
Gauhati Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:MR. S P ROY, MR.T YADAV,MS. P AGARWALA,MS. V RAI,JYOTISH DAS Advocate
For the Respondent: SC, GMC

JUDGMENT :

MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.

Heard Mr. S.P. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, Gauhati Municipal Corporation [GMC] for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3.

2. Mr. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the name of the respondent no. 4 can be struck off from the array of respondents.

3. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Roy, the name of the respondent no. 4 is struck off at the cost and risk of the petitioners. The Registry to do the needful.

4. In view of the limited nature of challenge made in this writ petition on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice and the instructions received by Mr. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, GMC in deference to the Order dated 20.01.2025, this writ petition is taken up for consideration at the motion stage itself, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties.

5. The case projected by the petitioners, briefly, is that they were running a business of car washing center from an ekchalia Assam Type house by obtaining a trade licence from the respondent GMC. The petitioners were running the business from the said pre


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top