THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J
Ranju Gogoi Bhagawati And Anr W/o. Prahlad Sankar Bhagawati - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And 4 Ors - Respondent
WP(C)/286/2023
Decided On : 21-01-2025
(A) Assam Public Services (Limitation of Functions) Regulation, 1951 - Regularization of services - Petitioners challenged final gradation list assigning seniority to private respondents who were regularized with retrospective effect - Court held that regularization of adhoc employees cannot disturb the seniority of regularly appointed employees. (Paras 15 , 18 )
(B) Seniority - Regularization of services of adhoc employees must be prospective and cannot be backdated to affect the seniority of regular appointees. (Paras 15 , 18 )
Facts of the case:
Petitioners were appointed as Overseer(Civil) after selection by APSC, while private respondents were regularized based on a Cabinet decision with retrospective effect. Court found this to be perverse.
Findings of Court:
The final gradation list was set aside, and a fresh list was to be prepared assigning seniority to petitioners above private respondents.
Issues: Whether the regularization of adhoc employees can have retrospective effect and affect the seniority of regular appointees.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that regularization of adhoc employees cannot be backdated to disturb the seniority of regularly appointed employees.
Result: Writ petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
Heard Mr. Adil Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. M. Kalita, learned Standing Counsel, Industries Department, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2; and Mr. K. Talukdar, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the private respondents No. 3, 4 & 5.
2. The petitioners, in the present proceeding, have presented a challenge to the final gradation list, circulated vide communication, dated 20.12.2022, of the cadre of Overseer(Civil) in the establishment of the Commissioner of Industries & Commerce Department, Government of Assam. The petitioners have also prayed for assigning to them, seniority position above the private respondents No. 3, 4 & 5, herein.
3. The brief facts requisite for adjudication of the issue arising in the present proceeding, is noticed as under:
The petitioners, herein, pursuant to an advertisement issued by the Assam Public Service Commission(APSC) for recruitment to the post of Junior Engineer(Civil & Mechanical) under PWD Roads and the post of Overseer(Civil) under the Industries & Commerce Department, Government of Assam, had submitted their respective applications for the same. On conclusion of the recruitment process; the Assam Public Service Commission(APSC) published the select list and therein, the names of the petitioners No. 1 & 2, herein, figured at Serial No. 1 and 4, respectively, against the post of Overseer(Civil) under the Industries & Commerce Department.
In terms of the recommendations so made by the Assam Public Service Commission(APSC) in favour of the petitioners, herein; the petitioners along with 3(three) others came to be appointed against the post of Overseer(Civil) under the Industries & Commerce Department, Government of Assam, vide order, dated 27.07.2003. The petitioners, accordingly, joined their respective service on 11.08.2003.
Subsequent to the joining of the petitioners in their respective service on 11.08.2023, pursuant to their recruitment by the Assam Public Service Commission(APSC); the respondent authorities, vide an order, dated 29.09.2003, had proceeded to regularize the services of private respondents No. 3, 4 & 5, herein, basing on the approval granted for the same by the State Cabinet in its meeting held on 10.06.2003. Vide the said order, dated 29.09.2003, the services of the private respondents No. 3, 4 & 5, were regularized with retrospective effect i.e. w.e.f. 12.06.2003.
It is contended in the writ petition that the respondent authorities, vide order, dated 25/26.02.2021, had published a provisional gradation list of the incumbents in the cadre of Overseer(Civil) under the Industries & Commerce Department and therein, while the respondents No. 3, 4 & 5 were placed at Serial Nos. 1, 2 & 3, respectively, the names of the petitioners No. 1 & 2, were placed at Serial Nos. 5 & 4, respectively. The petitioners, herein, submitted objection to the assignment of their seniority positions in the said provisional gradation list, dated 25/26.02.2021.
The respondent authorities, thereafter, vide order, dated 11.11.2021, published a fresh provisional gradation list of the incumbents in the cadre of Overseer(Civil) and therein, placed the names of the petitioners No. 1 & 2 at Serial Nos. 4 & 6, respectively, while the names of the private respondents No. 3, 4 & 5, were placed at Serial Nos. 1, 2 & 3, respectively.
It is projected that the petitioner No. 2 had submitted objections with regard to the seniority position assigned to him in the provisional gradation list, dated 11.11.2021.
The respondent authorities, vide order, dated 20.12.2022, proceeded to publish the final gradation list of incumbents in the cadre of Overseer(Civil) and therein, the names of the private respondents No. 3, 4 & 5, were placed at Serial Nos. 1, 2 & 3, respectively, while the names of the petitioners No. 1 & 2, were placed at Serial Nos. 4 & 6, re
Regularization of adhoc employees cannot be backdated to disturb the seniority of regularly appointed employees.
Point of Law : 10. Court should not embark upon on and enquiry into the merits of the case and that writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of laches alone.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the seniority of the petitioners should be counted from the date of their regularization as Assistant Engineers. The court also emphasized the....
The court emphasized the significance of considering the service in the supernumerary post as part of the sanctioned strength of the post of AE(C) and highlighted the principles of seniority calculat....
Service matter - Seniority - The seniority cannot be reckoned from the date of occurrence of the vacancy and cannot be given retrospectively unless it is so expressly provided by the relevant service....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.