SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 295

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Sabita Roy W/o- Lt. Moni Kanta Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MR H K J AHMED, MR. P MAHANTA, MS C DAS, MS. M BORGOHAIN; SC, PWD, GA, ASSAM; SC, DIMA HASAO; SC, FINANCE

JUDGMENT :

N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.

1. Heard Mr. P, Mahanta, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Also Heard Mr. C. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel Dima Hasao Autonomous Council, Mr. P. Nayak, learned Standing Counsel Finance Department and Mr. R. K. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel Accountant General (Assam), appears for the Respondent No. 4.

2. The petitioner by way of instituting the present proceeding has prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities to release to her the family pension other pensionary benefits due to her on account of the services rendered by her deceased husband.

3. Brief facts, requisite for adjudication of the issues arising in the present proceeding, is noticed as under :

4. The husband of the petitioner was initially engaged as a Muster Roll worker in the establishment of the Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD (R&B), Lumding Sub-Division w.e.f. 01.12.1991.

5. His services were thereafter regularized w.e.f. 22.07.2005. On account of certain differences arising between the petitioner and her husband, the petitioner had instituted proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, before the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top