IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Manish Choudhury, J.
Kajol Ghosh S/O- Pramud Chandra Ghosh and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Assam Represented By The Chief Secretary and Ors. – Respondent
WP(C)/3053/2024
Decided On : 21-03-2025
(A) National Highways Act, 1956 - Sections 3G(1) and 3G(5) - Land acquisition for National Highway Project - Petitioners dissatisfied with compensation awarded by Competent Authority, Land Acquisition (CALA) - Application for enhancement of compensation filed before Arbitrator - Joint Verification Report submitted as per Arbitrator's order - Matter reverted to Arbitrator for decision on compensation enhancement. (Paras 2-8)
(B) Writ Petition - Seeking direction for compliance with Arbitrator's order - Cause of action extinguished upon submission of Joint Verification Report - Writ petition closed. (Paras 7-8)
Facts of the case:
The petitioners' land was acquired for a National Highway Project, and they sought enhanced compensation due to dissatisfaction with the initial award. An Arbitrator was appointed to address their application for compensation enhancement.
Findings of Court:
The Joint Verification Report was submitted in compliance with the Arbitrator's order, leading to the closure of the writ petition.
Issues: The main issue was whether the submission of the Joint Verification Report extinguished the cause of action for the writ petition.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the submission of the Joint Verification Report in compliance with the Arbitrator's order eliminated the need for further proceedings in the writ petition.
Result: Writ petition closed.
ORDER :
Manish Choudhury, J.
Heard Mr. R.P. Sharma, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. M. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners; Ms. S. Konwar, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 5 & 6; Ms. R. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, NHIDCL for the respondent nos. 2 & 4; and Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the respondent no. 3.
2. In the process of land acquisition for a National Highway Project :-
‘Building [Widening/four-laning, etc.], maintenance, management and operation of connecting from NH-37A to NH-52 on the stretch of land from Km 17.3 to Km 182 [Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Sonitpur, Tezpur, Assam’ [‘the Highway Project’, for short] initiated by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways [‘the MoRT&H], Government of India [GoI], the parcels of land belonging to the petitioners, 44 [forty four] in nos., came to be acquired. The Competent Authority, Land Acquisition [CALA] had passed an Award under Section 3G[1] of the National Highways Act, 1956 [‘the N.H. Act’]. Dissatisfied with the amount of compensation assessed by the Competent Authority, Land Acquisition [CALA] in the Award passed under Section 3G[1] of the N.H. Act, the petitioners preferred an application before the Arbitrator appointed under Section 3G[5] of the N.H. Act seeking enhancement of the compensation on the ground that the Competent Authority, Land Acquisition [CALA] while determining the award, did not take relevant factors including market value of the land acquired in the proper perspective. The said application has been registered as Arbitration Case no. 01/2023.
3. By an Order dated 14.02.2023 passed by the Arbitrator in Arbitration Case no. 01/2023, a joint verification was directed for the purpose of examining the issue of justified compensation. The Competent Authority, Land Acquisition, Project Manager, NHIDCL, Tezpur and the jurisdictional Circle Officer were directed to visit the site and submit a joint verification report.
4. Ms. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, NHIDCL and Ms. Konwar, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam have placed an Office Letter no. e.120213/139 dated 11.03.2025 of the Additional District commissioner [LA], Sonitpur, Tezpur, that is, the Competent Authority, Land Acquisition [CALA] addressed to the office of the Senior Government Advocate, Assam enclosing therewith a Joint Verification Report submitted by the jurisdictional Circle Officer to the Competent Authority, Land Acquisition [CALA] on 06.03.2025.
5. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has also been furnished a copy of the Joint Verification Report.
6. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that as the Joint Verification Report has been submitted in terms of the Order dated 14.02.2023 of the Arbitrator, the matter would now revert back to the Arbitrator for deciding the application of the petitioners for enhancement of compensation.
7. The instant writ petition was filed seeking inter-alia a direction to the respondents to comply with the Order dated 14.02.2023 passed by the Arbitrator in Arbitration Case no. 01/2023. Since the Joint Verification Report has been submitted in deference to the Order dated 14.02.2023 passed by the Arbitrator in Arbitration Case no. 01/2023, there survives no cause of action to proceed further with the writ petition as the matter would now revert back to the Arbitrator. The writ petition is, therefore, closed.
8. A copy of the Joint Verification Report dated 06.03.2025 along with the Office Letter no. e.120213/139 dated 11.03.2025 of the Additional District commissioner [LA], Sonitpur, Tezpur, that is, the Competent Authority, Land Acquisition [CALA] is kept with the case record by marking it as Document-‘X’.
The submission of a Joint Verification Report in compliance with an Arbitrator's order extinguishes the cause of action for a writ petition seeking compliance.
The submission of a Joint Verification Report in compliance with an Arbitrator's order extinguishes the cause of action for a writ petition seeking compliance.
The court directed the petitioner to seek enhancement of compensation through the appointed Arbitrator under the National Highways Act, emphasizing the Arbitrator's role in addressing grievances rega....
The court ruled that compensation for land acquisition must reflect market value and consider hardships faced by landowners, as mandated by the National Highways Act and RFCTLARR Act.
Petitioner must approach the appointed Arbitrator for grievances regarding compensation assessment under the National Highways Act, 1956.
Market value for highway land compensation must follow statutory higher of stamp duty rates or average similar land sales using multiple deeds; single dissimilar sale deed use creates patent illegali....
Limited judicial interference under Sections 34/37 Arbitration Act in NHAI land compensation awards; no re-appreciation of evidence.
Narrow scope of judicial interference under Sections 34/37 Arbitration Act in NHAI land awards; no re-appreciation of evidence or modification.
Narrow scope of judicial interference under Sections 34/37 Arbitration Act in NHAI land compensation; no re-appreciation of evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.