IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Brahmaputra Annunnata Krishipam Samabai Samittee – Appellant
Versus
Mangaldoi Samabai Samittee @ Khalihoi Krisak Samabai Samittee – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. A.K. Gupta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Ms. D.D. Barman, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appears on behalf of the respondents.
2. This is an application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, “the Code”) challenging the judgment and order dated 16.03.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Darrang at Mangaldoi (hereinafter referred to as, “the learned First Appellate Court”) in Misc Appeal No. 08/2009 whereby the appeal filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 (d) read with Section 104 of the Code was dismissed.
3. From the materials on record, it is seen that the respondents herein had filed the suit before the Court of the learned Munsiff No. 1, Darrang at Mangaldoi (hereinafter referred to as, “the learned Trial Court”) which was registered and numbered as Title Suit No. 8/1995. In the said suit, the petitioner herein was the defendant No. 1. It is further seen that in the said suit written statement was filed by the defendants. However, nobody appeared on behalf of the defendants, for which, the suit proceeded ex-parte and vide the judgment and decree dated 08.07.1996, the said suit wa
Negligence of counsel does not excuse a party from the consequences of failing to participate in legal proceedings, emphasizing accountability in legal representation.
Deliberate delay in adjudication can lead to the closure of the right to file a written statement.
The right to file a written statement is essential and must be prioritized, though negligence can affect the outcome of such permissions.
Negligence and lack of compelling reasons for absence in court proceedings justify the denial of applications to set aside ex-parte judgments under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC.
An application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC requires compelling reasons for absence; mere negligence does not justify setting aside an ex-parte decree.
The court affirmed the closure of a petitioner's right to file a written statement due to repeated non-compliance and non-appearance, indicating a lack of seriousness in the proceedings.
Written statement – Failure to file written statement within stipulated period or even extended period cannot to be detrimental to interest of defendant – Procedures are handmaid of justice and provi....
Diligence and vigilance are essential in legal proceedings, and seeking mercy at the appellate stage without establishing a good ground does not advance the cause of justice.
Alleged negligence of the counsel and failure to file the written statement within the stipulated period were not sufficient grounds for review, as they did not warrant the exercise of Supervisory ju....
Setting aside ex-parte decree – Defendant has to show and satisfy that summons of suit was not duly served and that defendant was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing when suit was called upo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.