Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH
On The Death Of Aftab Hussain Mazumder His Legal Heirs Rashida Khatun Mazumder, (W/o. Late Aftab Hussain Mazumder) – Appellant
Versus
Sahab Uddin Barbhuiya, S/o. Late Kolomdor Ali Barbhuiya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdictional overview of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. formulation of substantial questions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. counsel arguments on jurisdiction and delay. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 4. limitation period for filing appeals. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's agreement on substantial questions. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. decision to remand the case for merit evaluation. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. administrative instructions on record handling. (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
(DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.)
Heard Mr. N. H. Mazarbhuiyan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Mr. M. J. Quadir, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. This is an appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘the Code’) challenging the order dated 10.08.2023 passed in Misc. (J) Case No.9/2023 arising out of Title Appeal No.02/2023 by the learned Court of the Additional District Judge, Hailakandi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the First Appellate Court’) whereby the application filed under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT , 1963 read with Order XLI Rule 3A of the Code was rejected and thereby confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Court dated 28.02.2020 i
The court emphasized a liberal application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, recognizing that delays attributed to erroneous legal advice merit condonation, allowing the matter to be decided on its....
The Court has the authority to exercise liberal discretion in condoning delays due to mistaken legal advice in appeal cases under the Limitation Act.
A court must liberally interpret sufficient grounds for condoning delays in filing appeals, prioritizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act must be decided before proceeding with the appeal on merit, as per the provisions of Ord....
An appellate court cannot entertain a time-barred appeal without first condoning the delay in accordance with the Limitation Act.
A party must provide substantial and convincing evidence to support a claim for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict construction of Section 3 and liberal construction of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, emphasizing that rights accrue based on Sec....
The court reiterated that the burden of proving sufficient cause for delay in filing an appeal lies with the appellant, and mere ignorance or reliance on counsel is insufficient.
A suit based on title for recovery of possession is not subject to limitation, and adverse possession must be pleaded and proved with particulars to affect the limitation period.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
