SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Gau) 1133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH 
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
Kakumoni Bhuyan S/o Late Naren Bhuyan - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam and Others - Respondents 
W.P. (C) No. 3501 of 2023
Decided On : 23-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.C. Biswas
For the Respondents: Dilip Mazumdar, R. Dhar

Compassionate appointments are time-sensitive and must be made without undue delay to address financial distress; stale claims will not be entertained as needs may change over time.

Headnote:(A) Compassionate appointment - Relevant considerations - The rejection of the application for compassionate appointment on grounds of delay and the necessity for immediate action to relieve financial distress of the deceased’s family was upheld as per the principles laid out in pertinent legal precedents. (Paras 7, 8, 9)

(B) Delay in application - The court emphasized that compassionate appointments cannot be claimed years after the death of the breadwinner as the sense of immediacy has diminished, thus making the claim impermissible. (Paras 9, 10)

(C) Legitimacy of claims - The necessity for assessing family financial condition and industry regulations was underscored, signaling that delay harms applicants and gives no reason for granting delayed compassionate applications. (Paras 33, 35)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, son of a deceased Gram Sevak, challenged the rejection of his application for compassionate appointment after 5 years of delay following his father’s death in harness.

Findings of Court:
The Court affirmed that the delay in seeking compassionate appointment makes it a stale claim and thus unfit for consideration.

Issues: The core issue revolved around the significance of timeliness when seeking compassionate appointment due to a family member's death and the role of economic conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court maintained that the lapse of time diminishes urgency and eligibility for compassionate appointment, noting that relief sought after prolonged delays contradicts the purpose of such provisions.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. claim for compassionate appointment after delay. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. criteria for compassionate appointments established. (Para 7 , 8)
3. immediacy is necessary for compassionate appointment. (Para 9)
4. petition dismissed due to staleness. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

N. UNNI KRISHNAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Dilip Mazumdar, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam, assisted by Mr. R. Dhar, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate; appearing on behalf of all the respondents.

2. The petitioner, herein, by way of instituting the present proceeding, has presented a challenge to the decision arrived at by the State Level Committee in its meeting held on 02.08.2022, towards rejecting his case for appointment on compassionate ground.

3. As projected in the writ petition, the father of the petitioner Late Naren Bhuyan, while working as a Gram Sevak under R.D. Wing, Nadaur Development Block, had died-in-harness on 02.09.2013. The petitioner in pursuance of the death of his father in harness, submitted an application in the month of November, 2023, praying for consideration of his case for appointment on compassionate ground. The application as submitted by the petitioner came to be placed before the Commissioner, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, instead of the same being placed before the jurisdictional District Level Committee. The petitioner, being aggrieved, approached this Court by way of instituting a writ petition being WP(c)7312/2018. This Court, vide order, dated 02.11.2019, upon appreciating the issues arising in the matter, disposed of the said writ petition by directing the respondent authorities to place the case of the petitioner before the jurisdictional District Level Committee for its consideration for appointment of the petitioner, herein, on compassionate ground. The case of the petitioner was, thereafter, placed before the jurisdictional District Level Committee in its meeting held on 06.09.2019. The said District Level Committee, on consideration of the application of the petitioner, proceeded to recommend his case for appointment on compassionate ground against an identified vacant post of Grade-III. The recommendation as made by the District Level Committee came to be placed before the State Level Committee in its meeting held on 02.08.2022. The State Level Committee, on consideration of the case of the petitioner, proceeded to reject the same on the ground that the application of the petitioner was being considered after 5 years from the date of the death of his father, in harness.

4. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has instituted the present proceeding before this Court.

5. The learned counsels appearing for the parties have reiterated the facts and circumstances as noticed hereinabove.

6. I have heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and also perused the materials available on record.

7. It is a settled position of law that public service appointment should be made strictly on the basis of open invitation of an application and on merits. The appointment on compassionate ground cannot be a source of recruitment. It is merely an exception to the requirement of law keeping in view the fact of the death of the employee while in service, leaving his family without any means of livelihood. In such cases, the object is to enable the family to get over the sudden financial crises. Such appointments on compassionate ground, therefore, have to be made in accordance with the Rules, Regulations, or, administrative instructions taking into consideration, the financial condition of the family of the deceased. The favourable treatment to the dependent of the deceased employee must have a clear nexus with the objects sought to be achieved thereby i.e. relief against destitution. At the same time, however, it should not be forgotten that as against the destitute family of the deceased, there are millions and millions of other families which are eq

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top