........ W/o Debashish Das vs ........, S/o Late Dilip Kumar Das

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Gau) 1983

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH AT ITANAGAR BENCH
Michael Zothankhuma, N.Unni Krishnan Nair
........ W/o Debashish Das – Appellant
Versus
........, S/o Late Dilip Kumar Das – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.C. Biswas.
For the Respondent: Mr. B. K. Singh.

Table of Content
1. divorce case filed by wife. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding cruelty. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's findings on marriage issues. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. settlement reached on alimony. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 21)
5. appeal withdrawn. (Para 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

M. Zothankhuma, J.

Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the appellant wife and Mr. B. K. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent husband.

2. The appeal has been filed by the appellant wife against the divorce decree granted on the respondent husband’s petition, by the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court-III, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati, vide judgment dated 22.06.2022 passed in FC(Civil) Case No. 174/2014.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant wife had published an advertisement, giving her personal details for matrimony. In the advertisement dated 01.02.2009 published by the appellant wife, the age of the appellant was shown to be 31 years of age. After a meeting of the families of the appellant and the respondent, the marriage between the parties took place on 10.05.2009. On the date of the marriage, the respondent was 41 years of age, while the appellant should have been