IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Belguri Natun Bazar Panjagana Masjid and Another – Appellants
Versus
The State of Assam and Others – Respondents
WP (C) No. 213 of 2026
Decided On : 13-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eviction based on land classification (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. establishment of mosque on disputed land (Para 3 , 4 , 12) |
| 3. criteria for the definition of vgr land (Para 8 , 19) |
| 4. court's analysis on eviction rights and representation (Para 10 , 11 , 17 , 21) |
| 5. assam land policy restrictions on land allotment (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. supreme court directives on illegal occupation (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. directions for representation and hearing procedures (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
1. Heard Mr. A. R. Bhuyan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. R. Borpujari, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.1. I have also heard Ms. M. Barman, the learned Junior Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioners against an action initiated by the District Administration for evicting the Petitioners on the ground that the land in question under the occupation of the Petitioners are Village Grazing Reserve lands.
3. The facts of the instant case as it emerges from the perusal of the writ petition is that the Petitioners had established a permanent Mosque in a plot of land admeasuring 1 Bigha 2 Kathas under Dag No.3 of Village Belguri under Khatowal Mouza in the District of Nagaon. It is an admitted fact as stated in Paragraph No.7 of the instant writ petition that the land in question is situated under Khatowal Mouza in village Belguri and falls under Kisamat No.3, Grazing Dag.
4. Be it as it may, the Petitioners upon setting up the permanent Mosque on the said land, have been requesting the Government for allotment of the said land as the said mosque caters to the needs of the local community residing in and around the said Masjid. Various representations in that regard have been filed from time to time.
5. It is the case of the Petitioners that on 03.12.2025, a notice was issued by the Circle Officer, Samaguri Revenue Circle informing the Petitioner No.1 that the land under their possession is a part of the Village Grazing Reserve and they would be evicted within 15 days from the date of the said notice. The Petitioners were also asked to submit valid documents relating to the said land within 7 days before the Circle Officer, Samaguri Revenue Circle and the date of the hearing was fixed on 12.12.2025 at 11:00 AM.
6. It is the further case of the Petitioners that the Petitioners thereupon submitted a representation to the District Commissioner, Nagaon to stop the eviction of the Masjid inasmuch as, the market set up in the said land was done with the permission of the concerned Gaon Panchayats and there has been also an application filed for allotment of the said land. The said representation being not considered, the Petitioners have therefore approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.
7. This Court vide an order dated 09.01.2026 passed an interim order directing that there shall be no eviction in terms with the notice dated 03.12.2025. The record reveals that the interim order thereupon have been extended from time to time.
8. In the meanwhile, an affidavit-in-opposition has been filed by the Respondent No.2 stating inter alia that the land where the Petitioner No.1 Masjid has been constructed is a VGR land, and as such, formal notices were issued to those who have encroached the VGR land at Beloguri, Kachari Gaon. It is also mentioned that on the date fixed for hearing i.e. on 12.12.2025, the Petitioners failed to produce any valid document/records during the time of hearing. Further to that, it is also mentioned that the Petitioners does not have any documentary evidence that they are landless. The said affidavit-in-opposition was filed on 06.02.2026 and a rejoinder affidavit was filed on 09.03.2026. The Petitioners in their rejoinder affidavit have denied the land to be a VGR land and further mentioned the procedure to be followed for notifying a grazing reserve.
9. It is therefor
Parties have the right to claim allotment over government waste lands, and eviction requires clear statutory acknowledgment of grazing reserve status.
The court affirmed the right to representation regarding land status and emphasized adherence to due process for eviction from Village Grazing Reserves, referencing the Assam Land Policy and Supreme ....
Rights for land allotment must align with governmental policies and regulations, specifically regarding Village Grazing Reserves, which are not subject to allocation except under defined exceptional ....
Occupants of government land have the right to contest eviction and seek allotment only if they prove the land is not designated for specific reserved purposes.
The court ruled that eviction without a hearing violates the principles of natural justice and Article 21 of the Constitution.
Eviction notices issued without proper adjudication violated natural justice; treated as Show Cause Notices allowing Petitioners to present their claims and receive a personal hearing.
The court ruled that eviction notices must adhere to principles of natural justice, requiring prior notice and an opportunity for affected parties to present their case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.