Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
DEVASHIS BARUAH
Belguri Natun Bazar Panjagana Masjid – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eviction based on land classification (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. establishment of mosque on disputed land (Para 3 , 4 , 12) |
| 3. criteria for the definition of vgr land (Para 8 , 19) |
| 4. court's analysis on eviction rights and representation (Para 10 , 11 , 17 , 21) |
| 5. assam land policy restrictions on land allotment (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. supreme court directives on illegal occupation (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. directions for representation and hearing procedures (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
1. Heard Mr. A. R. Bhuyan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. R. Borpujari, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.1. I have also heard Ms. M. Barman, the learned Junior Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioners against an action initiated by the District Administration for evicting the Petitioners on the ground that the land in question under the occupation of the Petitioners are Village Grazing Reserve lands.
3. The facts of the instant case as it emerges from the perusal of the writ petition is that the Petitioners had established a permanent Mosq
Parties have the right to claim allotment over government waste lands, and eviction requires clear statutory acknowledgment of grazing reserve status.
The court affirmed the right to representation regarding land status and emphasized adherence to due process for eviction from Village Grazing Reserves, referencing the Assam Land Policy and Supreme ....
Rights for land allotment must align with governmental policies and regulations, specifically regarding Village Grazing Reserves, which are not subject to allocation except under defined exceptional ....
Occupants of government land have the right to contest eviction and seek allotment only if they prove the land is not designated for specific reserved purposes.
The court ruled that eviction without a hearing violates the principles of natural justice and Article 21 of the Constitution.
Eviction notices issued without proper adjudication violated natural justice; treated as Show Cause Notices allowing Petitioners to present their claims and receive a personal hearing.
The court ruled that eviction notices must adhere to principles of natural justice, requiring prior notice and an opportunity for affected parties to present their case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
