SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 641

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J. 
Basanta Kumar Gogoi, S/o. Late Chandra Gogoi – Appellant 
Versus 
The State Of Assam, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Government Of Assam, Finance Department And  Ors – Respondent  
WP(C) 1754 of 2026 
Decided On : 06-04-2026 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. U.S. Bora, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. B. Gogoi, Addl. A.G.

Courts may set aside the cancellation of a business registration caused by the non-filing of statutory returns, provided the taxpayer undertakes to file all pending returns and pay all outstanding tax, interest, penalty, and late fees, thereby balancing statutory compliance with the interest of justice.

Headnote:(A) Goods and Services Tax - Cancellation of registration - Non-filing of returns - Statutory appeal dismissed on limitation - Writ jurisdiction - Whether cancellation of registration can be set aside upon assurance of compliance.

(B) Relief - Restoration of registration - Conditional upon filing of pending returns and payment of tax, penalty, interest, and late fees - Court's power to grant relief in interest of justice. (Paras 4, 5, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner's registration was cancelled due to the failure to furnish statutory returns for a period exceeding six months. An appeal filed against the cancellation order was dismissed by the appellate authority solely on the ground of limitation, leading the petitioner to approach the court.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the facts were similar to a previously decided matter and that the petitioner was entitled to similar relief. The order of cancellation was set aside, subject to the petitioner filing the pending returns and clearing all arrears including tax, penalty, interest, and late fees within a specified timeframe.

Issues: Whether the cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns should be upheld when the statutory appeal was dismissed on the ground of limitation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the cancellation of registration should be set aside to allow the petitioner to continue business operations, provided the petitioner fulfills the statutory obligations of filing returns and paying all outstanding dues within a specified timeframe.

Result: Writ petition disposed of; cancellation order set aside.

Table of Content
1. background and factual basis of gst registration cancellation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. conditional restoration of registration upon filing returns. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.

Heard Mr. U.S. Bora, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned Additional Advocate General, Assam appears on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner herein has filed the instant writ petition challenging the order dated 29.10.2024 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Guwahati-D-8 whereby the petitioner’s registration was cancelled. The brief facts which led to the filing of the instant writ petition are narrated herein under.

3. The petitioner herein is a business professional by occupation and is engaged in contractual works and the supply of materials. The petitioner carries on his business through his sole proprietorship firm under the name “Eastern Power Tech.” The petitioner is registered as a dealer under the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for which the petitioner has been issued a Registration Certificate in Form GST REG-06, bearing Registration No. 18AGOPG9677P1Z6 dated 23.09.2017.

4. It is the case of the petitioner that due to the non-filing of returns by the petitioner for a period of more than 6 (six) months, the petitioner was issued a show cause notice by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, for cancellation of the registration in Form GST REG-17/31 dated 13.05.2024 to the petitioner in the portal. It was further mentioned in the said show cause notice that the registration of the petitioner stood suspended w.e.f. 13.05.2024. At the relevant point of time, due to acute family burdens and unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not coordinate with his tax consultant for filing the pending statutory returns and therefore, defaulted in complying with the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 and the AGST Act, 2017, particularly with regard to the filing of statutory returns, i.e., GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, on the GST portal within the prescribed due dates for a period exceeding 6 (six) months. On 29.10.2024, the respondent No.4 cancelled the registration on the ground of failure to furnish return for the prescribed period. The cancellation of the registration was given effect from 29.10.2024.

5. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had submitted the return for the period October for the financial year 2024-2025. The filing of the return in Form GSTR-3B has been enclosed as Annexures- 4 to the writ petition. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 107 of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 before the Appellate Authority on 15.11.2025 against the impugned order by which the petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled. However, the Appellate Authority, i.e., the respondent No. 3 vide order dated 12.12.2025 dismissed the said appeal solely on the technical ground of limitation. It is under such circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 6. This Court finds it pertinent to take note of that the issue similar to the present one was dealt with by this Court in detail in the judgment rendered in the case of Motaleb Bhuyan Vs. The State of Assam & Ors reported in (2025) SCC OnLine Gau 1429

7. It is the opinion of this Court that as the facts of the instant case are similar to those petitioners in the judgment rendered in the case of Motaleb Bhuyan, (supra), the petitioner herein is entitled to similar reliefs. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the following observations and directions:-

(i) The order of cancellation of registration dated 29.10.2024 is set aside and quashed.

(ii) The petitioner herein is directed to file the returns for the period from 13.05.2024 till date, within 30 days from the date of the instant judgment. It is observed that if the returns have been filed, there shall be no necessity for fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top