SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 669

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Smti Tamuk Yaniam and Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State of AP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of the petition for quashing fir based on settlement. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. submissions regarding matrimonial dispute resolution and state consent. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. judicial assessment of the appropriateness of quashing civil-natured disputes. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. application of supreme court guidelines regarding quashing criminal proceedings. (Para 12 , 13)
5. final court order granting the petition to quash fir. (Para 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT :

ANJAN MONI KALITA, J.

Heard Mr. H. T. Tara, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. G. Tado, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The instant criminal petition has been filed jointly by the petitioners under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying for quashing and setting aside of the FIR dated 24.01.2026, registered as Itanagar Women P.S. Case No.05/2026, corresponding to GR Case No.63/2026, registered under Sections 85/79/351(2) of BNS, 2023, on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

3. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner No.1, who is the wife of the petitioner No.2 lodged an FIR dated 20.01.2026, before the Offic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top