THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Fariduddin Ahmed S/o. Late Nimar Ali - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam And Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) No. 2210 of 2025
Decided On : 20-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and claims regarding non-payment of vehicle hire charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. judicial assessment of undisputed liability and calculated arrears owed. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. mandatory direction for settlement of outstanding contractual debts. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
DEVASHIS BARUAH, J.
Heard Mr. S. A. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. S. R. Baruah, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondents.
2. The instant petition has been filed by the Petitioner being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the Respondent Authorities in not making payment of the bills of the Petitioner.
3. The case of the Petitioner herein is that the Petitioner is the owner of a vehicle bearing Registration No. AS-02/U-6082 (Tata Sumo Gold EX CR4 B), which was hired by the Office of the Superintendent of Police, Hojai, in the month of May, 2019, and has continued to run on hire under the said office till date.
4. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner had submitted hire charge bills amounting to th Rs.23,60,675/- for the period from May, 2019 to 28 February, 2025. However, the Respondent Authorities, more particularly the Respondent No.4 had disbursed only a part payment of Rs.2,28,000/- and the remaining outstanding amount has not been paid to the Petitioner. The learned counsel further submitted that the Petitioner had submitted various representations before the Respondent Authorities seeking release of the remaining amount; however, the same still remains unpaid, for which the Petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.
5. Mr. S. R. Baruah, the learned Government Advocate during the course of the hearing has placed before this Court an instruction issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Hojai, Assam, dated 13.05.2026. The said instruction is kept on record and marked with the letter “X”.
6. From a perusal of the said instruction, it appears that the Respondents have duly admitted that the Petitioner is entitled to an amount of Rs.25,31,476/- and out of which, a sum of Rs.3,45,824/- has already been paid to the Petitioner. Accordingly, the remaining balance due and payable stands at Rs.21,85,652/-. Paragraph Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the said instruction dated 13.05.2026 being relevant are reproduced herein under:
“3. That Sir, the aforementioned writ petition concerns a vehicle, a Tata Sumo bearing Registration No.AS-02U-6082, registered in the name of Farid Uddin Ahmed. This vehicle was hired from May 1, 2019 to 30.09.2024.
4. That Sir, the total liability concerning the aforementioned vehicle amounts to Rs.25,31,476/- of this amount, Rs.3,45,824/- has already been paid to the petitioner. The remaining balance due is Rs.21,85,652/-.
5. That Sir, the Hire charge bills are sanctioned from APHQ. Therefore, all the Hire charge Bills are already sent to APHQ for sanction.
7. That Sir, the owner of the hired vehicle willingly submitted a letter offering a 2%negotiation on the total Hire Charge Bill for a one-time settlement. Furthermore, the resubmitted Hire Charge Bills have been sent to the Assam Police Headquarters for sanction.”
7. Taking into account the above, it therefore appears that the Petitioner at present is entitled to Rs.21,85,652/-.
8. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the following observations and directions:
(i) The Respondent Authorities are directed pay the Petitioner the admitted amount of Rs.21,85,652/- or such amount after statutory deductions.
(ii) The said exercise be completed within a period of 6 (six)months from the date a certified copy of the instant judgment is served upon the Respondent No.2 i.e. the Director General of Police, Guwahati.
(iii) Any amount paid during the pendency of the present proceedings would be set off at the time of disbursal of the amounts to the Petitioner.
Government authorities must comply with contractual obligations by ensuring timely payment for services rendered, preventing undue hardship on service providers.
When state authorities admit liability for services rendered, they are obligated to discharge the debt. The court may exercise writ jurisdiction to direct the payment of such admitted outstanding due....
Government authorities must ensure timely payment of acknowledged financial dues to prevent undue hardship to petitioners.
Petitioner's claim for dues upheld; respondents must pay admitted amount and verify remaining claims within specified time.
Where state authorities admit liability for services rendered, the court may exercise its writ jurisdiction to direct the disbursement of the admitted amount within a specified timeframe to ensure th....
The court affirmed that an accepted payment claim creates an obligation on authorities to disburse the amount promptly to avoid undue hardship to the claimant.
Public authorities have a duty to ensure timely payment of admitted liabilities, and delays without valid justification can prejudice claimants.
Governmental authorities are obligated to honor undisputed claims for payment, particularly in public service requisition scenarios, and must process these claims expediently.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.