THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, KAUSHIK GOSWAMI, JJ.
Abul Basfar, S/o. Md Abdul Khaleq – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By Pp,Assam And Ors. – Respondent
Crl.A. 247 of 2025, Crl.A. 30 of 2024
Decided On : 20-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural consolidation of cross-appeals regarding a single judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. history of litigation, previous remand, and the facts of the underlying conflict. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. summary and analysis of evidence including medical reports and witness testimony. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 4. application of exception iv to section 300 ipc in sudden land dispute fights. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 5. vicarious liability under section 149 ipc and appellate scope regarding acquittals. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 6. final orders, modification of conviction to section 304 part-i, and dismissal of acquittal challenges. (Para 54 , 55 , 56) |
Judgment :
M. Zothankhuma, J.
1. Heard Mr. M. K. Choudhury, learned counsel for the appellant in Crl. A. 247/2025 and Mr. P. K. Deka, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Also heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4, 6 & 7 and Ms. S. H. Borah, learned Addl. PP for the State. Mr. P. K. Deka, learned counsel appears for the appellant in Crl. A. 30/2024 and Mr. M. K. Choudhury, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 2.
2. Crl. A. 247/2025 and Crl. A. 30/2024 have both put a challenge to the impugned judgment dated 22.12.2023 passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Sonitpur, Tezpur in Sessions Case No. 105/2023. In Crl. A. 30/2024 the appellant Fazar Ali has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.15,000/-, in default simple imprisonment for three months. On the other hand, 6 co-accused have been acquitted of the charge under Sections 302/149 and also under Sections 148/325/326 by the same impugned judgement. Crl. A. 247/2025 has been filed by the informant, who has put to challenge the acquittal of the 6 co-accused by the learned Trial Court, while the appellant in Crl. A. 30/2024 has challenged his conviction under .
3. As the challenge in both the appeals relate to the same impugned judgment dated 22/12/2023, the appeals are being decided by this common judgement and order.
4. The facts of the case, in brief, is that prosecution witness-3, (PW-3), who is the younger brother of the deceased Musa Alam, submitted an FIR dated 18/04/2007 to the Officer-in- Charge Jamuguri Police Station, stating that while the deceased and his brother-in-law (Mainul Haque), were ploughing the land that they had taken on lease for 2 years from Bhimlal Sharma and Khargalal Sharma, the accused persons, viz, 1) Najrul Haque, S/o. Unknown, (2) Fazar Ali, S/o. Unknown, (3) Asiya (Achiya) Begum, W/o. Fazar Ali, (4) Ainul Haque, S/o. Md. Fazar Ali, (5) Gulzar Hussain, S/o. Unknown, (6) Chabirul Haque, S/o. Unknown, (7) Sirajul Haque, S/o. Unknown and (8) Jamaluddin S/o. Unknown, residents of Kasomari, P.S. Jamuguri, attacked the deceased Musa Ali and one Mainul Haque with lathis and dao. They both sustained grievous injuries and Musa Ali passed away around 7.30 a.m, while being taken to Dholaibhil Hospital. Pursuant to the FIR, Jamuguri P.S. Case No. 42/2007, under Section 147/148/149/325/326/302 IPC was registered.
5. The case was entrusted to PW-16, who was the First Investigating Officer. Thereafter, on the transfer of PW-16, the case diary was handed over to PW-15, who submitted the charge sheet, wherein, a prima facie case under section 147/148/149/325/326/302 IPC was found established against 1) Md. Fazar Ali, S/o: Lt. Kurjat Ali, 2) Md. Ainul Haque, S/o: Md. Fazar Ali, 3) Md. Gulzar Hussain S/o: Abubakkar Siddique, 4) Smti. Achiya Khatun, W/o: Md. Fazar Ali, 5) Md. Chabirul Haque, S/o: Lt. Abubakkar Siddique, 6) Md. Nazrul Haque Islam, S/o: Md. Idris Ali, all are residents of Kasomari, P.S. Jamuguri, 7) Md. Jamaluddin, S/o: Lt. Amiruddin, R/o: Laltapu, 8) Md. Sirajul Islam, S/o: Md. Idris Ali, R/o: Tengaguri, P.S. Lahari
Gurmail Singh & Another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another
Nandalal Vs. State of Maharashtra
: Rioting - Unlawful assembly - Right of private defence - Exercise of the right of defence of person and property -
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of exception 4 to section 300 of the IPC to determine the nature of the accused's act and the appropriate charge under the IPC.
The court upheld murder convictions, emphasizing that minor witness discrepancies do not invalidate strong corroborating evidence; intent and premeditation were crucial in determining the charges.
1. If two reasonable conclusions are possible on the basis of the evidence on record, the Appellate Court should not disturb the findings of acquittal. 2. The acquittal re-enforces and reaffirms the....
Offence of murder – Convicted under S. 325 of IPC - Although prosecution witnesses have deposed that the injuries on the leg of the deceased was caused by axe, rod, crowbar and stick etc. in absence ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellant's actions fell under Exception 4 of Section 300 of the IPC, as the evidence established that the appellant acted in the heat of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.