SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 368

M.RAMACHANDRAN
Anitha – Appellant
Versus
Kanjirappilly Block Panchayat – Respondent


Judgment :-

M. Ramachandran, J.

Nine members of the Erumely Grama Panchayat have filed this Writ Petition, inter alia praying that Ext.Pl proceedings are to be quashed. Ext.Pl series have been issued by the Secretary to the Kanjirappilly Block Panchayat, who had been the authorised Officer by the State Election Commission, for presiding over a meeting of a No Confidence motion, and in the course of his above duties. By the notices, the members had been advised that a meeting was to be convened on 7th of August, 2004 for considering the No Confidence motion, which had been received by him against the President and Vice President of the Grama Panchayat. It is not disputed that a meeting had been convened thereafter. The petitioners had refrained from participating in the meeting, on the plea that notice, as issued by the second respondent, was not in consonance with law. The motion as above had been carried and thereafter the members had elected a fresh President and Vice President. The Writ Petition had been filed in the aforesaid context, challenging the proceedings from the stage of notice.

2. The justifiability and validity of the notices that had been served on petitioners 1 to 8,


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top