SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 492

JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA, K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR, A.K.BASHEER
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Paulose – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Is the insurer absolved of the liability to indemnify the insured merely because the driver's licence had not been renewed on the date of the accident? This is the short question.

2. Facts are not in dispute. The accident occurred on 23.5.1997. Ext.P1 insurance policy was subsisting as on the said date. The third respondent, who was riding the scooter having registration No.KL-7/A-9171 had a driving licence. Its validity period expired on 30.11.1996. He renewed it later, on 18.6.1997. As on the date of accident, he did not have a valid driving licence, according to the appellant. Therefore, the appellant did not have the liability to indemnify the owner, the appellant submitted. A person without an effective and valid driving licence is not duly licenced. Consequently there was breach of the terms and conditions in the policy. On the basis of this violation of policy conditions, the insurer can plead immunity from the liability to indemnify the insured. Policy contained a condition that only those having "an effective and valid driving licence" alone can drive the vehicle. In this case the rider did not have an effective and valid licence as on the date of the acciden




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top