SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 174

J.B.KOSHY, R.RAJENDRA BABU
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Sreekumar – Respondent


Judgment :-

This application is filed for condoning the delay of 177 days in filing the criminal appeal along with the application for leave to file appeal against an order of acquittal. The Sessions Court acquitted the accused and State has filed the above appeal with an application for leave to file an appeal under S. 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Code). The preliminary objection raised by the respondents is that S. 5 of the Limitation Act is not applicable in this case and hence petition is liable to be dismissed. In support of the above, a Division Bench decision of this Court in Crl. M.P. No. 3375/1993 in Crl. A./93 was cited before us. In the above case it was held that provisions of the Limitation Act including S. 5 will not apply in view of specific stipulations regarding time in S. 378(5) of the Code. The Division Bench in the above unreported case held as follows :

"This application is filed under S. 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Section 378(5) of the Code specifically says thus :

"No application under sub-section (4) for the grant of special leave to appeal from an order of acquittal shall be entertained by the High Cour










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top