SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 632

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
The District Officer – Appellant
Versus
Shanil Kumar – Respondent


Judgment :-

Radhakrishnan, J.

The question that has come up for consideration in these cases is whether Public Service Commission is obliged to advice candidates for Non-joining duty vacancies even after the expiry of the rank list.

2. Learned single judge took the view that since vacancies were reported during the currency of the rank list, those vacancies still remain and not extinguished and therefore Public Service Commission could advice candidates for appointment even after the expiry of the rank list. Counsel appearing for the Public Service Commission took exception to the said reasoning placing reliance on several decisions of Division Bench of this court particularly the decisions in Vimalakumari v. Public Service Commission (1994 (2) KLT 97 ), Babu v. State (1996 (1) KLT 349), Balakrishnan v. P.S.C. 1994 (1) KLT 490 and Benoy v. P.S.C. 1997 (2) KLT 492 etc.

3. Counsel for the contesting respondents placed reliance on the decision of a Division Bench of this court in Narayanan v. State of Kerala (1981 KLT 321) and Indian Bank v. Jayasree (1982 (2) KLT 464 ) and also Mariyakutty v. Municipal Commissioner (1975 SLR 188 ) and contended that since vacancies never extinguished du







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top