R.BHASKARAN
Kutty Nanu – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
R. Bhaskaran, J.
These. three second appeals 'arise out of the same suit and first appeal. There were 41 plaintiffs in O:S. No. 487 of 1978 on the file of the Munsiff, Thiruvalla. That suit was for a declaration that they are members belonging to Hiridu Mala Araya Community. It is stated that t11ey are entitled for the benefits available to the members of the Scheduled Tribe and the falVily members of the plaintiffs' were given such benefits by the State. Since the Tahsildar refused caste certificate to the children of the plaintiffs' stating that plaintiffs are not Hindu Mala Araya, the suit is filed.
2. The trial court decreed he suit. The decision of the trial court was based on Ext. A I patta in respect of 17 cents of property assigned on registry in favour of the Mala Araya Karayogam, Ext. _2 true copy of the schedule showing the distribution of population numerically important Scheduled Tribes of Kerala and certain certificates issued by the Tahsildar, Thinivalla, to some of the relatives of the petitioners. The contention of the defendants is that the plaintiffs belong to Araya Community which is not included in the list of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes. Araya
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.