SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Ker) 215

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, K.A.MOHAMMED SHAFI
Jerry Joseph Michael – Appellant
Versus
Selvaraj – Respondent


Judgment :-

Mohamed Shafi, J.

The landlord - petitioner in R.C.P. No. 49/1994 on the file of the Rent Control Court, Alappuzha is the revision petitioner. The R.C.P. is filed seeking eviction of the respondent under Sections 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (Kerala Act 2/1965).

2. The respondent is conducting a Jewellery business in the petition schedule premises after obtaining the same on rent from the original landlord. The revision petitioner purchased the petition schedule room as per the registered assignment deed dated 31.5.1993 from the original owner. Thereafter respondent attorned to the revision petitioner and has been paying rent. The rent due from 1.6.1993 was in arrears. The revision petitioner needs the petition schedule building to conduct a business of his own. Therefore, the above R.C.P. is filed by him.

3. The respondent resisted the petition contending that he has been in possession of the building prior to the year 1940 and as such he is entitled to the benefit of Section 11(17) of the Kerala Act 2/1965. He has also contended that the claim for eviction of the building on the ground of bona fide need is not at all bona fide and



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top