SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Ker) 212

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.SANKARASUBBAN
Haridasan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

S. Sankarasubban, J.

Petitioner - P.A. Haridasan, is a member of the Subordinate Judicial Service of the Kerala State. He entered into the judicial service as Judicial Magistrate of Second Class and now he is working as judicial First Class Magistrate. The controversy in this case is regarding the caste to which the petitioner belongs. While the petitioner claims that he belongs to Thandan Community, respondents 1 and 2 are taking the view that he belongs to Thiyya community. The Thandan Community was declared to be a Scheduled Caste so far as the Travancore-Cochin area is concerned from 1950 onwards. But it was extended to the whole of Kerala only by Act 108 of 1976. The entire controversy arose because petitioner's caste in the High School Certificate was originally described as Thiyya but after the coming into force of Act 108 of 1976, petitioner got it corrected and changed it to Thandan. It was after this petitioner applied for the post of Magistrate under the General Recruitment as well as the Special Recruitment for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. It appears that in both the categories petitioner came first, but because of the fact that he has crossed the m














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top