SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 129

K.NARAYANA KURUP, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Saroja Mony – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

AR. Lakshmanan, ag. C.J.

Heard Mr. K.C. John, Sr. Advocate and Mr. N. Sankara Menon for petitioners, Mr. T.M. Yousuff, Addl. Advocate General and Smt. Molly Jacob, Government Pleader for the State and Mr. Babu Varghese, Standing Counsel for Water Authority.

2. The Original Petitions were filed by the petitioners challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents by Ext. P2 and P2(a ) as barred by limitation. Exts. P2 and P2(a ) are the notifications issued under S.4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 of 1894), hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for acquiring the lands specified therein situated in Aluva East and West Villages, Thrikkakara North, Vazhakkalaand Edapally South Villages. The lands are needed for a public purpose viz., "for Adhoc Augmentation of Kochi Water Supply Scheme". A notification in the gazette was issued by the Special Tahsildar (LA) General Ernakulam on 25.7.1996 (Ext. P2) in accordance with the provisions of sub-s.(1) of S.4 of the Act. In view of the urgency of the case, the Board of Revenue in its Order No. LIZ (C) 6-19762/96 K.Dis. dated 22.7.1996 under sub-s.(4) of S.17 of the said Act has directed that















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top