SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 406

Judges : A.R.LAKSHMANAN,K.K.USHA,P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN,S.SANKARASUBBAN,C.S.RAJAN
Gopalakrishnan Nair - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : O.P.No.16192 of 1999
Decided On : 10/14/1999
Advocates Appeared :
Govind K. Bharathan For Petitioners Ashok H. Desai, Pallav Shishodai, Advocate General (M.K. Damodaran), Government Pleaders (K.K. Ravindranath & Alexander Thomas), U.K. Ramakrishnan & K. Radhakrishnan For Respondents

Headnote:

Whether the Hindu Ministers in the Council of Ministers should have faith in God and temple worship while nominating the members to the Managing Committee of the Guruvayoor Devaswom under S.4 of the Guruvayoor Devaswom Act? and Whether Hindu Ministers who are not believers in God and Temple worship can, by reason of their not having faith in Hindu God and Temple worship, are disqualified from nominating the members of the Managing Committee of Guruvayoor Devaswom, who should have faith in God and Temple worship, and must also make and subscribe an oath affirming their faith in God and Hindu Religion and believe in Temple worship.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, the President of the Kerala Kshethra Samrakshana Samithi, a body registered under the Societies Registration Act, and the General Secretary of Vishva Hindu Parishad, filed an Original Petition challenging the procedure for the election of members to the Managing Committee of the Guruvayoor Devaswom, which, according to S.4 of the Guruvayoor Devaswom Act, 1978, is to be done by Hindus among the Council of Ministers of the State of Kerala. The petitioners alleged that the Hindus among the Council of Ministers will not elect or nominate any member to the Managing Committee of the Guruvayoor Devaswom without obtaining permission from the Court. A detailed order was passed in C.M.P. No 26343 of 1999 recording the undertaking given by the learned Advocate General and also of the Government Pleader that the Hindus among the Council of Ministers will not elect or nominate any member to the Managing Committee of the Guruvayoor Devaswom without obtaining permission from the Court. A separate order of reference was also passed by the said Bench on the same day referring the matter to a larger Bench of five Judges.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the Hindu members of the Council of Ministers, who nominate the members of the Managing Committee of Guruvayoor Devaswom need only be Hindus, without any insistence on their being believers in temple worship. Section 4 of the Act itself ensures that persons who have faith in God and Temple worship and profess Hindu religion alone are qualified to be nominated to the Managing Committee and the members shall, before entering upon their office, make and subscribe an oath in the form prescribed.

Issues: 1. Whether the Hindu Ministers in the Council of Ministers should have faith in God and temple worship while nominating the members to the Managing Committee of the Guruvayoor Devaswom under S.4 of the Guruvayoor Devaswom Act? 2. Whether Hindu Ministers who are not believers in God and Temple worship can, by reason of their not having faith in Hindu God and Temple worship, are disqualified from nominating the members of the Managing Committee of Guruvayoor Devaswom, who should have faith in God and Temple worship, and must also make and subscribe an oath affirming their faith in God and Hindu Religion and believe in Temple worship.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The right to manage Devaswom fund and temple property is a purely secular matter outside the purview of Articles 25 and 26(b) of the Constitution. 2. The right under Art.26(d) can be taken away by statutory law. 3. Classification as to who should do the nomination is not the matter of An. 14. 4. The right to elect the member to a Board is a right conferred by the statute and is a matter of policy.

Final Decision: The Original petition fails and is hereby dismissed. However, no costs were awarded.

Judgment :-

AR. Lakshmanan, J.

The petitioners in the Original Petition challenge the procedure for the election of members to the Managing Committee of the Guruvayur Devaswom, which, according to S.4 of the Guruvayur Devaswom Act, 1978, is to be done by Hindus among the Council of Ministers of the State of Kerala. When the Original Petition came up before the Division Bench comprising of AR. Lakshmanan, Ag.C.J. (as he then was) and S.Sankarasubban, J, on 9th July, 1999, a detailed order was passed in C.M.P. No 26343 of 1999 recording the undertaking given by the learned Advocate General and also of the Government Pleader that the Hindus among the Council of Ministers will not elect or nominate any member to the Managing Committee of the Guruvayur Devaswom without obtaining permission from this Court. A separate order of reference was also passed by the said Bench on the same day referring the matter to a larger Bench of five Judges. Since the field is covered by the decision of a larger Bench and three Full Benches of this Court, the Division Bench felt that this matter requires consideration by a larger Bench, preferably by a Bench comprising of five Judges. That is how this matter came up before this larger Bench.

2. The first petitioner is the President of the Kerala Kshethra Samrakshana Samithi, a body registered under the Societies Registration Act, having its headquarters at Kozhikode. According to the petitioners, the said Samithi is specifically formed and registered for the purpose of protection of the devotees of various temples in Kerala and for protection of temples, their properties, their rights, etc. The second petitioner is the General Secretary of Vishva Hindu Parishad, the office of which is situated in the Pavakkulam templepremises. The petitioners, is stated, have filed this Original Petition on their own behalf as ardent believers in God and temple worship and ardent devotees of Lord Guruvayoorappa. It is stated that they worship regularly at Sri Guruvayoor Temple and thus constitute its denomination. It is also stated that the Original Petition is filed on behalf of their respective organisations and countless millions of devotees of Lord Guruvayoorappan, who are unable to come to this Court for reasons of financial constraint and lack of organisation and facilities.

3. Section 4 of the Guruvayoor Devaswom Act, 1978, with which we are concerned reads as follows : "4. Composition of Committee:- (1) The Committee shall consist of the following members, namely:.

(a) the Zamorin Raja;

(b) the Karanavan for the time being of Mallisseri Illom at Guruvayoor;

(c) the Thanthri of the Temple, ex.qfficio;

(d) a representative of the employees of the Devaswom nominated by the Hindus among the Council of Ministers;

(e) not more than five persons, of whom one shall be a member of a Scheduled Caste, nominated by the Hindus among the Council of Ministers from among persons having interest in the Temple.

(2) A person shall be disqualified for being nominated under clause (e) of sub.s.(1), if .

(i) he believes in the practice of untouchability or does not profess the Hindu Religion or believe in temple worship; or

(ii) he is an employee under the Government or the Devaswom; or

(iii) he is below thirty years of age; or

(iv) he is engaged in any subsisting contract with the Devaswom, or

(v) he is subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of sub.s.(3) of S.5.

(3) The members of the Committee shall, at its first meeting, elect one of its members as its Chairman.

(4) Every member of the Committee shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe in the presence of the Commissioner an oath in the following form, that is to say.

"I, AB, do swear in the name of God that I profess the Hindu Religion and believe in temple worship and that I do not believe in the practice of un touch ability."

The Managing Committee of Guruvayoor Devaswom consists of nine members as provided in clauses (a) to (e) of sub.s.





























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top