SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 259

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, RAJENDRA BABU, K.K.USHA
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ajayakumar – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.K. Usha, J.

The question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether passengers in private vehicle carried not for hire or reward are covered by an insurance policy issued in terms of the provisions contained under S.147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Perumbavoor following a bench decision of this Court in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Appukuttan (1995 (1) KLT 807), took the view that such a policy, which is usually referred as an'Act policy', would cover such gratuitous passengers. After admitting the appeal a Bench of this Court referred the matter for consideration of a larger bench doubting the correctness of 1995 (1) KLT 807.

2. In an accident happened on 8.2.91 by way of collision between a tempo van and a jeep the 1 st respondent who was a passenger in the jeep sustained injuries. He filed O.P. (MV) No. 1045/91 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Perumbavoor claiming compensation to the extent of Rs. 50,000/-. The appellant who was the insurer of the jeep at the time of the accident was impleaded as 5th respondent. The Tribunal granted an amount of Rs. 12,500/- as compensation to the petitioner and t












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top