SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Ker) 531

S.SANKARASUBBAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Aravindakshan – Appellant
Versus
Sukumaran – Respondent


Judgment :-

A,R. Lakshmanan, J.

Heard Mr. B.N. Shiv Shankar and Mr. O. Bala Narayanan for the respective petitioners, Smt. V.P. Seemandini and Mr. M.S. Unnikrishnan for 1st respondent in O.P. 19891/1998 and the Government Pleader for the respondents in O.P. 19892/1998. In view of the great public importance of the matter, we requested Mr. T.P. Kelu Nambiar, Sr. Advocate to assist the Court on the legal issue raised in these writ petitions. Accordingly, he was also heard.

2. O.P. 19891/1998 was filed by one P.P. Aravindakshan and one O. Bala Narayanan, Advocate, who are the plaintiffs in a suit (un-numbered) for recovery of a liquidated demand in money, amounting to Rs. 20.000/-, with future interest arising from a written contract against one K. Sukumaran as the defendant. The suit was filed invoking the summary procedure under O. XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provisions were introduced so far as the State of Kerala is concerned by the substitution of O. XXXVII by the Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 1976, which came into effect on 1.2.1977. The suit was filed in the Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam. The office of the Principal Munsiff refused to number












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top