SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 528

S.SANKARASUBBAN
Jancy Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment :-

S. Sankarasubban, J.

The petitioner challenges in this Original Petition S.27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, hereinafter referred to as "the Act". The further prayer is to declare that the petitioner being a woman cannot be arrested or detained by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, hereinafter referred to as "the Forum", exercising the powers under S.27 of the Act and for quashing Ext. P5 order of the Forum. The case of the petitioner is that she is a partner of the firm M/s. Geo Financiers, Thiruvalla. Complaining that the amounts deposited by respondents 4 and 5 had not been returned to them, they filed petitions before the Forum as O.P. Nos. 740/1993 and 102/1994. Both these complaints were accepted by the Forum and in O.P. No. 740/1993, the respondents therein were directed to pay the principal sum of Rs. 45,000/- with interest at 12% per annum from 15.6.1989 to 12.4.1992 and thereafter on the total amount of Rs. 65,768.87 and Rs. 300/-as cost within one month. In O.P. 102/1994, similarly the opposite parties were directed to pay the principal sum of Rs. 20.000/- with interest at 12% per annum from 25.6.1989 to 12.4.1992 and thereafter on the total amount









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top