SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ker) 348

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Peter – Appellant
Versus
Aravindakshan – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

Petitioners are aggrieved by the rejection of Election Petition, A.R.C. No. 1819 of 1996 by the Arbitrator holding that the petitioners have not affixed necessary court fees for entertaining the election dispute.

2. Election Petition dated 19.7.1996 was filed by six petitioners before the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Ernakulam, who vide Ext. PI order dated 7.8.1996, in exercise of the powers under S.70(1)(c) of the Act, appointed the Assistant Registrar (General), Kanayannur to hear and dispose of the matter.

3. Arbitration case was tiled against the election held on 23.9.1996 in the Thevara Urban Co-operative Society, in which respondents 1 to 5 got elected. Petitioners wanted a declaration that the election held on 23.9.1996 is void and illegal and that petitioners should be declared to have been elected in the place of respondents 1 to 5. Before the Arbitrator a preliminary objection was raised by the third respondent contending that Arbitration Case is not liable to be entertained since the requisite court fees have not been remitted by the petitioners. According to third respondent and others, petitioners ought to have remitted Rs.


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top