SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ker) 166

Judges : PARIPOORNAN,JAGANNADHA RAJU
Kepee Sons - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : T.R.C.66 of 1990
Decided On : 06/06/1990
Advocates Appeared :
Jose P.Joseph For Petitioner

The interpretation of S.5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act and the applicability of exemption claims on purchase turnover in the course of export.

Headnote:

Sales Tax - Exemption Claim - Interpretation of S.5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner claimed exemption on a turnover of Rs.14,90,948.91 as the purchase turnover in the course of export under S.5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The claim was negatived during assessment.

Finding of the Court:

The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal held that S.5(3) of the C.S.T. Act is inapplicable in this case, as the purchase made by the petitioner within the State is not the preceding purchase occasioning the export but a purchase removed by one more step.

Issues: Interpretation of S.5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, applicability of exemption claim on purchase turnover in the course of export.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Bismillah & Co. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1989)73 STC 135) to support the finding that the purchase made by the petitioner within the State does not come under S.5(3) of the C.S.T. Act.

Final Decision: The Tax Revision Case was dismissed by the court.

Judgment :-

Paripoornan, J.

The petitioner is an assessee under the Kerala General Sales tax Act, We are concerned with the assessment year 1979-80. While making the assessment, the claim for exemption on a turnover of Rs.14,90,948.91 stated to be the purchase turnover in the course of export coming within S.5(3) of the Central Sales tax Act, was negatived. The purchase turnover represented that of pepper and dry ginger sold interstate to exporters who in turn exported the goods outside the territory of India. The Sales tax Appellate Tribunal, by its order dated 6-4-1989, held that S.5(3) of the C.S. T. Act is inapplicable in this case. The sale which occasioned to export is the sale by the Bombay dealer (Exporter) to the foreign buyer. The sale or purchase which preceded such export (the penultimate purchase) which comes within S.5(3) of the C.S.T. Act, is the purchase made by the Bombay Exporter who purchases goods from the revision-petitioner and effects exports. What is taxed in this case is the purchases made by the petitioner in this State. Such purchase is not the preceding purchase occasioning the export but purchase removed by one more step. So, the purchase made by the petitioner within the State is not just the immediate transaction before the export sale. Such a purchase made by the petitioner will not come under S.5(3) of the C.S.T. Act. The Sales tax Appellate Tribunal rightly held so, relying on the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Bismillah & Co. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1989)73 STC 135). The said decision has our

concurrence.

2. There is no merit in this Tax Revision Case. It is dismissed. Dated this the 6th day of June, 1990.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top