Judges : K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
A.C.John - Appellant
Versus
The Divisional Forest Officer, Kottayam, And Another - Respondent
Case No : O.P. Nos. 14046, 14213, 14933 and 15096 of 1996-V
Decided On : 10/18/1996
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner: M/s. Youseff and Aysha, Advocates. For the Respondent: Noble Mathew, Govt. Pleader.
Forest Department - Power to Release Seized Vehicle - Kerala Forest Act, 1961, Section 61A
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the question of whether an authorised officer of the Forest Department has the power to release a vehicle seized pending confiscation proceedings under Section 61A of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961. The forest authorities took the view that they have no power to release the vehicle if the offence is believed to have been committed in respect of timber, charcoal, firewood, or ivory which is the property of the Government.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that forest authorities not below the rank of an Assistant Conservator of Forests have the power to pass interim orders releasing the vehicle in appropriate cases, pending finalisation of confiscation proceedings, subject to terms and conditions they deem fit. The court set aside the orders passed by the authorities and allowed the petitioners to make a fresh representation before the forest authorities, to be considered by an officer not below the rank of an Assistant Conservator of Forests.
Issues: The issues involved the interpretation of Sections 52, 53, and 61A of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, and the authority of forest officers to release seized vehicles pending confiscation proceedings, especially when the property involved belongs to the Government.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of the Act in light of its preamble, object, and scheme, emphasizing that the power to release the vehicle should be exercised judiciously, considering the purpose and object of the Act. It concluded that forest authorities have the power to order interim release of the vehicle in appropriate cases, pending confiscation proceedings.
Final Decision: The court set aside the orders passed by the authorities and allowed the petitioners to make a fresh representation before the forest authorities, to be considered by an officer not below the rank of an Assistant Conservator of Forests. The judgment was not taken as a direction to release the vehicle in all cases, and it was for the petitioners to convince the authorities that the request made by them was genuine and bona fide, and in accordance with the guidelines prescribed.
Question involved in these Writ Petitions is as to whether an authorised officer of the Forest Department has got power to release the vehicle seized pending confiscation proceedings under Section 61A of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, hereinafter called the 'Act'. In all these cases, forest authorities took the view that pending confiscation proceedings, they have no power to release the vehicle, if the offence is believed to have been committed in respect of timber, charcoal, firewood or ivory which is the property of the Government.
2. Chapter VIII of the Act deals with offences, penalties and procedure. Section 52 of the Act authorises Forest Officer or Police Officer, when there is reason to believe that a forest offence has been committed in respect of any timber or other forest produce, to seize such timber or produce, together with all tools, ropes, chains, boats, vehicles and cattle used in committing any such offence. Officer who is seizing the property under sub-section (1) shall place on such property or the receptacle, if any, in which it is contained, a mark indicating that the same has been so seized and shall as soon as may be make a report of such seizure to the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence on account of which the seizure has been made. Magistrate upon receipt of any such report shall take such measures as may be necessary for the trial of the accused and the disposal of the property, according to law. When any person is convicted of a forest offence, all timber or other forest produce in respect of which such offence has been committed, and all tools, ropes, chains, boats, vehicles, cattle or any other article used in committing such offence shall be liable, by order of the convicting Magistrate to confiscation. Section 53 enables any Forest Officer of a rank not inferior to that of a Ranger, who or whose subordinate has seized any tools, boats, vehicles or cattle under the provisions of Section 52, to release the same on the execution by the owner thereof a bond for the production of the property so released, if and when so required before the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try the offence on account of which the seizure has been made.
3. However, Section 61A of the Act says not withstanding anything contained in Sections 52 to 61, where a forest offence is believed to have been committed in respect of timber, charcoal, firewood or ivory which is the property of the Government the officer seizing the property under sub-section (1) of Section 52 shall without any unreasonable delay, produce it, together with all tools, ropes, chains, boats, vehicles and cattle used in committing such offence, before an officer authorised by the Government in this behalf by notification in the Gazette, not being below the rank of Assistant Conservator of Forests. Where an authorised officer seizes under sub-section (1) of Section 52 any timber, charcoal, firewood, or ivory which is the property of Government, or where any such property is produced before an authorised officer under sub-section (1) of this section, and he is satisfied that a forest offence has been committed in respect of such property, such authorised officer may, whether or not a prosecution is instituted for the commission of such forest offence, order confiscation of the property so seized together with all tools, ropes, chains, boats, vehicles and cattle used in committing such offence. However, no order confiscating any timber, charcoal, firewood, ivory, tools, ropes, chains, boats, vehicles or cattle shall be made under Section 61A unless the person from whom the same is seized is given a notice in writing informing him of the grounds on which it is proposed to confiscate such timber, charcoal, firewood, ivory, tools, ropes, chains, boats, vehicles or cattle. He should also be given an opportunity of making a representation in writing within such reasonable time as may be specified in the notice against the grounds of con
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.