SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Ker) 353

T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.B.KOSHY
Anto Mamkoottam – Appellant
Versus
Peruvanthanam Service Co-operative Bank – Respondent


Judgment :-

Ramakrishnan, J.

These two unnumbered appeals are posted before us on a reference made by Balasubramanyan, J. The question posed before the learned Single Judge and referred for decision is whether the orders challenged in the two appeals have the force of decrees attracting an appeal under S.96 of the Code of Civil Procedure or whether they are merely orders conferring a right of appeal on the appellant under O. XLIII R.1 CPC. Being a question relating to the practice to be followed generally by the Courts in the matter of entertaining appeals, the learned Single Judge was of the view that there should not be any confusion on the question and as such it is not proper to refer the question to a Division Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the question. Incidently, the learned judge has also pointed out in the order of reference the correctness of the decision reported in Alt v. Muhammed All 1995 (2) KLT225 = (ILR 1995 (3) Kerala 383). AS such it is necessary to consider the correctness of the said decision also.

2. The appeals filed are against the orders passed in two claim petitions, LA. No. 217(a) of 1994 in O.S. No. 341 of 1994 and I.A. No. 220(a) of 1994 in O









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top