SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 252

N.DHINAKAR
R. Balakrishna Pillai – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

The petitioners in the above petitions are A1, A3, A5, A7, A8, A10 and A12 in C.C. No. 1 of 1991 on the file of the Special Judge for Edamalayar Investigations, Ernakulam.

2. The proceedings were instituted before the trial Court against petitioners for various offences punishable under various provisions of the Penal Code and the provision of Prevention of Corruption Act. It is the case of the prosecution that these petitioners along with other accused entered into a criminal conspiracy during the period 1980 to 1987 and conceived a plan to make illegal profits for themselves in executing the construction of Idamalayar dam as a part of the Idamalayar project.

3. Idamalayar dam as a part of the Idamalayar project was sanctioned by the Planning Commission and huge expenditure in its construction was incurred. Later number of leaks were discovered in the tunnel, which showed the inferior quality of construction of the dam which became a matter of public concern. The State Government appointed the then sitting Judge of the Kerala High Court as the Commission of Inquiry to conduct the probe. The Commission of Inquiry found the former Secretary. Irrigation and Power and cert











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top