SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ker) 340

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Pushpa Devi – Appellant
Versus
Public Service Commission – Respondent


Judgment :-

The question that is posed for consideration in the instant case is as to whether a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe would lose the benefit of that caste or tribe would lose the benefit of that caste or tribe on migration to another State, even if that State recognises the caste or tribe of that member as the one belonging to Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe.

2. In the instant case, petitioner belonged to Kanyakumari District in the State of Tamil Nadu and was married to one P.O. Darmaraj on 19.1.1989, who is a native of Kerala. She applied for the post of Dairy Extension Officer in pursuance to a notification dated 15.3.1991 issued by the Kerala Public Service Commission. In her application, she claimed her community as Hindu Sambava. As per the information furnished in column 12 of the application, she belongs to the State of Tamil Nadu. As the selection pertained to the Special Recruitment from among SC/ST candidates, a person belonging to any State other than the State of Kerala, is not eligible for the benefit of community of appointment in the State. She was therefore not eligible to apply forthe post in response to the notification dated 15.3.199







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top