The first plaintiff in O.S.6 of 1983 is the appellant. The second plaintiff has been impleaded as respondent No. 2. The plaintiffs are the children of one Raru. The defendant in the suit was another son of Rani. In addition to the plaintiffs and the defendant, Raru had another child Unnooli. The defendant is respondent No.1 in the Second Appeal. Pending Second Appeal he died on 13-2-1991. His wife Unni Peri was

impleaded as additional respondent in the Second Appeal. The defendant, respondent No.1 put forward a contention that pending the proceedings he had assigned the plaint schedule properties in favour of One Alavi and one Mohammed. The said persons have been supplementally impleaded as additional respondents in this Second Appeal. There appears to he a mistake showing the ranking in the memorandum of Second Appeal. The ranking will he corrected to show Unni Peri, wife of the first respondent as supplemental respondent No. 3. Alavi as supplemental respondent No. 4 and Mohammed as supplemental respondent No. 5,

2. The suit by the plaintiffs was one for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the plaint schedule properties on the ground that he