THOMAS
Abbas – Appellant
Versus
Sankaran Namboodiri – Respondent
The net was spread wide by a landlord to catch his tenant at least on one of the many grounds set on it. Ultimately the tenant was caught on one ground. which was upheld by the authorities under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. 1965 (for short 'the Act'). Of course that one ground is enough to get an order of eviction. Rent Control Court.and the Appellate Authority found concurrently that the tenant ceased to occupy the building for more than six months without reasonable cause. Revisional authority did not interfere with the finding. Consequently. the tenant now faces threat of imminent eviction. Hence he filed this original petition under Article 227 of the Constitution in challenge of the said order of eviction.
2. Tenant was conducting a hotel business in the building. Landlord alleged that the tenant kept the building closed for about one year preceding the date of application. Tenant disputed the allegation and contended that he was conducting business in the building all through. Landlord took out a commission to inspect the shop and the commissioner who went to the place found the shop remaining closed and also observed certain features such as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.