P.SUBRAMONIAN POTI, P.GOVINDA NAIR, P.NARAYANA PILLAI
GOUTAMI DEVI SITAMONY – Appellant
Versus
MADHAVAN SIVARAJAN – Respondent
1. The question for decision in this appeal is whether the assignee from an appellant could seek to get impleaded in the appeal under 0.22 R.10 C. P. C. after the death of the appellant and after the period within which the appeal would abate under R.3 (2) of Order XXII by reason of the failure to implead legal representatives of the deceased appellant. This question arises under the following circumstances.
2. In execution of the decree in O. S.922 of 1963 of the 1st Additional Munsiff's Court, Trivandrum, the decree-schedule property was sold and that was purchased by a stranger in court auction. The auction-purchaser, in whose favour the sale was confirmed, sought to take delivery. This was objected to by the vendee of the property from the defendant in the suit. Such vendee made an application to set aside the sale and that application was ultimately allowed by the execution court. Against that order the auction-purchaser filed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in the court below. Subsequent to the filing of this appeal he executed a deed in favour of the respondent here purporting to transfer his rights in the property purchased by him in the court-auction. That was on 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.