SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Ker) 240

V.KHALID, P.JANAKI AMMA
KUNHI MOYIN – Appellant
Versus
PATHUMMA – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The criminal revision petition as well as the writ petitions come before us on reference since important questions of law are involved in these cases. The main questions that arise in the writ petitions are the following;

(1)Whether S.125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is violative of Art.14 and 19 of the Constitution;

(2)Whether S.125 offends the fundamental rights under Art.25;

(3) Whether a wife who was divorced or who obtained divorce before the Act came into force can seek the benefit of the section. In other words, whether this section can be retrospective in operation.

(4) Whether the definition of wife in S.125 (1) offends S.125 (4) of the Code.

The prayer in the petitions is to declare Explanation (b) to S.125 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for short, the Code, ultra vires the Constitution, that it is in conflict with the personal law of Muslims and for other incidental reliefs. To put it shortly, the question agitated before us is that since the new Code confers on wives, who have been divorced or who have obtained divorce and remain unmarried, a right of maintenance, the relevant portion of the section has to be struck down.

2. The constit
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top