SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ker) 274

Judges : K.SUBBA RAO,C.SHAH,S.M.SIKRI
State of Kerala - Appellant
Versus
N.Sami Iyer - Respondent
Case No : C. A. No. 490 of 1964
Decided On : 10/26/1965
Advocates Appeared :
V. A. Syed Mohammed; M. R. Krishna Pillai; For Appellant Sardar Bahadur Saharya; Arun B. Saharya; For Respondent

The judgment established the principle that in the case of repeal followed by fresh legislation on the same subject, the court must determine whether the new Act indicates a different intention to destroy old rights and liabilities.

Headnote:

Taxation - Sales Tax - Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1957 - S.3(5), S.26A, S.5(vii) - The court discussed the interpretation and application of S.3(5) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act and its impact on the liability of turnover under the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1957. The court also analyzed the effect of S.26A and S.5(vii) in preserving old rights and liabilities. The judgment highlighted the intention of the legislature and the absence of clear and precise words to override the rights attached to the liability under S.3(5) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a tobacco dealer, objected to the assessment of turnover for the assessment year 1957-58, arguing that the goods had already been assessed at the point of purchase under the Madras General Sales Tax Act. The High Court accepted the assessee's contention, ruling that the turnover was not liable to tax.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the turnover of Rs. 7,757.54 was not liable to taxation under the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1957, based on the interpretation of relevant provisions and the absence of clear intention to override the rights attached to the liability under the Madras General Sales Tax Act.

Issues: The issues involved the interpretation of S.3(5) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the impact of S.26A and S.5(vii) of the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1957, and the intention of the legislature in preserving old rights and liabilities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the turnover was not liable to taxation under the new Act, as there was no clear intention to override the rights attached to the liability under the Madras General Sales Tax Act.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the turnover of Rs. 7,757.54 was ruled not liable to taxation.

Judgment :-

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Kerala in Tax Revision Case No. 44 of 1960.

2. The respondent, N. Sami Iyer, hereinafter referred to as the assessee, is a dealer in tobacco. He objected to the assessment of the turnover of Rs. 7,757.54 for the assessment year 1957-58, inter alia, on the ground that the goods were the subject-matter of purchases which had already been assessed at the point of purchase in the hands of the assessee. He failed before the Sales Tax authorities, but in a revision the High Court accepted his contention and held that this turnover was not liable to tax.

3. In order to appreciate the contention of the appellant it is necessary to mention a few facts. During the period April 1, 1957 to September 30,1957, the assessee was residing in Malabar and in this area the Madras General Sales Tax Act (9 of 1939) applied. S.3(5) of this Act provides:

"The taxes under sub-sections (1), (1-A) and (2) shall be assessed, levied and collected in such manner and in such instalments, if any, as may be prescribed:

Provided that

(i) In respect of the same transaction of sale, the buyer or the seller, but not both, as determined by such rules as may be prescribed, shall be taxed;

(ii) Where a dealer has been taxed in respect of the purchase of any goods in accordance with the rules referred to in clause (1) of this proviso, he shall not be taxed again in respect of any sale of such goods effected by him."

It is common ground that tobacco was taxable at the purchase point under the Madras Act and that the turnover with which we are concerned had suffered taxation at that point under the Madras Act.

4. The Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1957 (12 of 1957) came into force on October 1, 1957. This Act changed the short title of the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax Act, 1125 (11 of 1125) to the General Sales Tax Act, 1125, and extended it to the whole of the State of Kerala, including Malabar District. S.14 of Act 12 of 1957 inserted S.26A in Act 11 of 1125 which reads as follows:

"26A. Transitory provisions.-(1) In the application of this Act to the Malabar District referred to in sub-section (2) of S.5 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, during the financial year ending with 31st March, 1958, the provisions of this Act shall be subject to the provisions contained in Schedule II.

(2) The Government may from time to time by notification in the Gazette add to, alter or cancel Schedule II.

Schedule II is in the following terms:

1. Every registration effected and every licence issued under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 or the rules made thereunder in their application to the Malabar District referred to in sub-section (2) of S.5 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Malabar area), and in force at the commencement of the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act. 1957, shall be deemed to have been effected or issued under this Act or the rules made thereunder,

2. In calculating the total turnover for the financial year ending with 31st March 1958 of a dealer in the Malabar area for purposes of sub-section (3) of S.3 of this Act, the turnover of the dealer under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 up to the commencement of the Travancore-Cochin General Sates Tax (Amendment) Act, 1957, shall also be taken into account..."

5. The effect of S.26A and the Schedule, among other things, is that the dealer's registration and the licenses are deemed to have been effected under this Act, and secondly, that the total turnover for the period April 1, 1957 to September 30,1957, is to be taken into account under the General Sales Tax Act.

6. Act 12 of 1957, by S.15 inter alia repealed the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, as in force in the Malabar District, referred to in sub-section (2) of S.3 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. S.3 (5) of the General Sales Tax Act, 1125, is in the same terms as S.3(5) of t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top