Judges : M.S.MENON,P.GOVINDA NAIR
Ninan - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : T. R. C. No. 35 of 1964
Decided On : 07/13/1965
Advocates Appeared :
K. C. John; P. A. Cyrus; Alex Manuel; For Petitioner Mani J. Meenattur; For Respondent
The court held that the revisional powers conferred on the Deputy Commissioner of General Sales Tax by S.15(1)(i) of the General Sales Tax Act cannot be exercised after the expiry of the period provided by R.33 of the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950. The court also emphasized that the revisional power can only be exercised in circumstances where the Sales Tax Officer himself could have taken action under R.33.
Fact of the Case:
The Deputy Commissioner's exercise of revisional power in relation to the assessment year 1955-56, which ended on 31-3-1956, was found to be related to escaped turnover.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the revisional power conferred by S.15 can only be exercised within the period mentioned in R.33, namely, three years after the end of the assessment year, and only in circumstances where the Sales Tax Officer himself could have taken action under R.33.
Issues: Interpretation of revisional powers under S.15(1)(i) of the General Sales Tax Act and the period provided by R.33 of the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of S.15(1)(i) and R.33, emphasizing the limitation on the exercise of revisional powers and the circumstances under which such powers can be exercised.
Final Decision: The court allowed the tax revision case but made no order as to costs.
1. A similar if not the identical question arose for decision before this Court on a former occasion. This court then took the view that the revisional powers conferred on the Deputy Commissioner of General Sales Tax by S.15(1)(i) of the General Sales Tax Act, 1125 cannot be exercised after the expiry of the period provided by R.33 of the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950. The case is K. Sarvothama Srinivasa Shenoy & Co. v. Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax & Sales-tax, Kozhikode and is reported in 1965 KLT. 304. That case was decided after considering the provisions in S.12 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act and R.17 of the Madras General Sales Tax Rules. The corresponding provisions in the General Sales Tax Act, 1125 and the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950 are S.15 of the Act and R.33 of the Rules. The relevant parts of S.15 and R.33 are extracted below: - The relevant part of S.15 of the General Sales Tax Act, 1125.
"15. Authorities competent to pass orders in revision: (1) The Deputy Commissioner may
(i) suo motu, or
(ii) on application,
call for and examine the record of any order passed or proceeding recorded under the provisions of this Act by any officer subordinate to him, for the purpose of satisfying himself as to the legality or propriety of such order or as to the regularity of such proceeding, and may pass such order with respect thereto as he thinks fit:
Provided that the Deputy Commissioner shall not revise any order or proceeding under this sub-section if
(a) Where an appeal against the order or proceeding lies to the Appellate Tribunal, the time within which such appeal may be made has not expired, or.
(b) the order or proceeding has been made the subject of an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
(2) The Board of Revenue may
(1) suo mote, or
(ii) in respect of any order passed or proceeding recorded by the Deputy Commissioner under sub-section (1) or any other provision of this Act, on application, call for and examine the record of any order passed or proceeding recorded under the provisions of this Act by any officer subordinate to it, for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of such order, or as to the regularity of such proceeding, and may pass such order with respect thereto as it thinks fit:
Provided that the Board of Revenue shall not revise any order or proceeding under this sub-section if
(a) Where an appeal against the order or proceeding lies to the Appellate Tribunal, the time within which such appeal may be made has not expired; or
(b) the order or proceeding has been made the subject of an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
(3) In relation to an order of assessment passed under this Act, the power of the Deputy Commissioner under Clause (i) of sub-section (1) and that of the Board of Revenue under Clause (i) of sub-section (2) shall be exercisable only within a period of four years from the date on which the order was communicated to the assessee."
And the relevant part of R.33 of the General Sales Tax Rules, 1950.
"33 (1) If for any reason the whole or any part of the turnover of business of a dealer or licensee has escaped assessment to the tax in any year or if the licence fee has escaped levy in any year, the assessing authority or licensing authority as the case may be, subject to the provisions of sub-rule (2) may at any time within three years next succeeding that to which the tax or licence fee relates determine to the best of his judgment the turnover which has escaped assessment and assess the tax payable or levy the licence fee in such turnover after issuing a notice to the dealer or licensee and after making such enquiry as he considers necessary.
(2) Wherein respect of the turnover referred to in sub-rule (1) an order has already been passed under S.14 or 15, the assessing authority shall make a report to the appropriate appellate or revising authority as the case may be which shall thereupon after giving the dealer concerned a reasonable opportunity o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.