SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Ker) 259

M.MADHAVAN NAIR
Mathai – Appellant
Versus
Oommen – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The appellant herein is the plaintiff in a suit for refund of price paid for a void court sale in his favour.

2. The suit property belonged to Narayani Panicker, who mortgaged it with possession to Kurien Isaac and subsequently hypothecated the equity of redemption to the 1st defendant. 1st defendant sued on the hypothecation, as O.S. No. 308 of 1109 on the file of the Munsiff, Thiruvella, obtained decree thereon, took out execution, and purchased the suit property in court auction on Dhanu 4,1113, (Vide the sale certificate Ext. C) and also got symbolical delivery of the property. Subsequently he sold his rights as per Ext. D to Isaac Sosamma, who, by that time, had succeeded to the mortgage on the property.

Subsequent to the aforesaid court-sale, the equity of redemption was again sold in execution of 0. S. No. 211 of 1109 on the file of the same court on Meenom 12,1121, and the sale was confirmed on Medom 30, 1121. (Vide the sale certificate Ext. F). The decree-holder therein was the 2nd defendant Bank, of which the 1st defendant was then the liquidator under a voluntary liquidation. The latter court-sale was for Rs. 400/- and the purchaser therein was the 3rd defen





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top