The revision is filed challenging the leave granted to respondents 1 to 3 to institute a suit under Section 92 CPC against the petitioner and respondents 4 to 6, among whom respondent No.4 is stated to be a public religious trust. The revision petitioner was the third counter petitioner in the petition for leave which is numbered as O.P.No.1/2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Prumbavoor. Parties are hereinafter referred to as petitioner and respondents as ranked in the above O.P. before the court below.

2. Petitioners in the O.P. applied for leave under Section 92 CPC to institute a suit in respect of the fourth respondent, a public religious trust, setting forth a case that the trust has been created with the objective of spreading the teachings of Jesus Christ and it is governed by the provisions of a trust deed executed on 14.4.1987. Claiming to be the beneficiaries of that trust leave was applied for to sue the respondents. It was challenged jointly by the third and sixth respondents contending that the O.P. was not maintainable. It was further contended that the reliefs claimed in the proposed suit had already been agitated by some others and found against in a previ