SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ker) 913

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
Reji Jose – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Police – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Sethunath, Advocate.
For the Respondent: K.J. Muhammed Ansar, Public Prosecutor.

Judgment :

1. Petitioner is the defacto complainant in S.C.No.165/2009 on the file of Additional Sessions Court (Ad hoc-I), Kottayam, pending trail. This petition is filed under S.482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to order further investigation under S.173(8) of Code of Criminal Procedure by a superior officer not below the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police under the direct control of Superintendent of Police, Kottayam contending that there is lacuna in the investigation conducted and in such circumstances, in the interest of justice, a further investigation is to be ordered.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor were heard.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, relying on the decision of the Apex Court in Randhir Singh Rana v. The State being the Delhi Administration (1997 (1) KLT SN 56 (C.No.73) SC=1996 STPL (LE) 22611 SC) argued that the power under S.173(8) of Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be exercised by the Magistrate or the Sessions Judge after cognizance of the offence was taken and learned Sessions Judge cannot order further investigation and therefore, this Court has to consider whether a further investigation






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top