P.S.GOPINATHAN
G. John, Managing Director, Eruro Marine – Appellant
Versus
Alosious. Y. , Puthenveedu – Respondent
The 1st respondent herein prosecuted the revision petitioner before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Kollam in C.C No. 733 of 2003 alleging offence u/s. 138 of the Nogotiable Instruments Act. It was contended that the revision petitioner owed a sum of Rs. 3,71,734/- and in discharge of the said liability a cheque which was marked as Ext.P1 was issued. When Ext.P1 was presented for collection, the same was dishonoured for insufficiency of funds and that despite the demand to discharge the liability, no payment was made.
2. The revision petitioner in response to the process issued entered appearance and pleaded not guilty when the particulars of the offence was read over and explained. Hence he was sent for trial. On the side of the respondent, he was examined as PW1 and Exts.P1 to P6 were marked. When questioned u/s.313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he denied the incriminating evidence. On his side two witnesses were examined as DWs 1 and 2 and Exts.D1 and D2 were marked. The learned Magistrate on appraisal of evidence, arrived a conclusion of guilty. Consequently the revision petitioner was convicted for offence u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Ac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.