P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Vrindavan Apartments Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Authority – Respondent
CR
The petitioner is challenging the fixation of liability under the Kerala Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act with regard to the contribution to be paid in respect of the construction of a building which was got effected by the petitioner through the 4th respondent as a contractor. The main grievance of the petitioner is that, the statutory appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed as per Ext.P7, without entertaining the same, stating that the necessary deposit to an extent of 1% of the amount in dispute has not been paid and the necessary proof of deposit has not been produced along with the appeal which is a pre-requisite as contemplated under Rule 14 of the relevant Rules.
2. With regard to the sequence of events, it is to be noted that the petitioner is a Private Limited Company, undertaking construction of flats and one of its projects by name 'Vrindavan Palace' was entrusted to the 4th respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that, by virtue of clause 6 (b) of the construction agreement executed between the petitioner and the 4th respondent, all the statutory payments in connection with the employment of workmen for the above
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.