T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
P. R. Bhaskaran, Thrikkathara Parambu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
These two writ petitions raise a common question and are therefore disposed of by a common judgment.
2. Mainly it is concerned with the interpretation of the Kerala Land Assignment Amendment Rules, 2009 whereby certain Rules including Rule 8 have been amended.
3. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.33434/2009 obtained patta as per Ext.P1 for an extent of 4.50 cents of land in Sy. No.72/12 of Thiruvankulam Village. The same was granted under the Kerala Land Assignment Rules 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). He is residing in the said plot after constructing a small house. For the purpose of raising money for the marriage of one of the daughters and for educational needs of the second daughter, the petitioner decided to sell the property which is evidenced by Ext.P2 agreement for sale. In the light of the amended Rule 8, the authorities raised an objection regarding the registration of the sale deed and it is in these circumstances, he has filed this writ petition. It is contended that the amendment will not apply to the patta granted to the property of the petitioner.
4. In W.P.(C) No.36240/2009, the petitioner is the owner and in possession of 1.61 ares of land in S
Varkey Abraham v. Secretary to Government (2007 (3) KLT 702).
State of T.N. v. Arooran Sugars Ltd. {(1997) 1 SCC 326}.
Meerankhan v. State of Kerala (2007 (4) KLT 430).
Travancore Rayons Ltd. v. Kerala State Pollution Control Board (2000 (1) KLT 175).
State of Gujarat v. Raman Lal Keshav Lal Soni {(1983) 2 SCC 33}.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.