A.K.BASHEER, K.M.JOSEPH, J.CHELAMESWAR
Udayan – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Agro Machinery Corporation Ltd – Respondent
A.K. BASHEER, J.
1. This Writ Petition has come up before us on a reference made by a Division Bench noticing apparent conflict between two bench decisions. In fact, a learned Single Judge had referred the case to the Division Bench after noticing inconsistency in the views taken by the two Division Benches.
2. The question that has cropped up in this case is whether Respondent No.1 Corporation is justified in tinkering with or varying the minimum qualifications prescribed in the Special Rules for recruitment to the post of Deputy Manager (Technical), while notifying the vacancies.
3. The relevant facts which led to this legal imbroglio may be briefly noticed: Petitioners are now working as Regional Managers (Marketing) in the cadre of Deputy Manager in Respondent No.1 Corporation, which is a Company fully owned by the Government of Kerala. The Corporation, being an instrumentality of the Government of Kerala, is State within the meaning of Art.12 of the Constitution of India.
4. Petitioner No.1 is a B.Tech (Mechanical) with Master of Business Administration (MBA) as an additional qualification. After working as Assistant Engineer in the Kerala Automobiles limited for
Prathapan v Registrar of High Court of Kerala (1984 KLT 625)
Government of Andhra Pradesh v P. Dilip Kumar ((1993)2 SCC 310)
Umesh Chandra Shukla v Union of India & ors. (AIR 1985 SC 1351)
M.P. Public Service Commission v Navnit Kumar Potdar ((1994) 6 SCC 293)
Mohd, iazul Usman Gani & ors. v District & Sessions Judge
Malik Mazhar Sultan & anr. v U.P. Public Service Commission & ors. ((2006) 9 SCC 507)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.