R.BASANT, M.C.HARI RANI
Sheeba Pulikkal – Appellant
Versus
Shoukath Ali – Respondent
BASANT, J.
1. Is the jurisdiction of the civil court (and consequently the Family Court) ousted by the enactment of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the M.W.Act’)?
This is the question that arises for consideration before us in this appeal.
2. We shall briefly refer to the factual matrix before we advert to the question of law. The claimant is the divorced wife of the respondent. After divorce, she preferred O.P.No.815 of 2007 claiming return of 80 sovereigns of gold ornaments worth Rs.5.6 lakhs and an amount of Rs.8.7 lakhs which according to her were allegedly being retained by her divorced husband illegally. In these circumstances, she claimed return of the gold ornaments/cash by her husband and preferred the claim before the Family Court.
3. The claim was resisted. Inter alia, it was contended that the Family Court has no jurisdictional competence to entertain the petition. It was contended that such a claim by the divorced wife was maintainable only before the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction under Section 3 of the M.W Act. It was prayed, in these circumstances, that the original petition may be dismissed as no
Kunhimohammed V Ayishakutty [2010 (2) KLT 71]
Bai Tahira V Ali Hussain [AIR 1979 SC 362]
Raja Ram Kumar Bhai V Union of India [AIR 1988 SC 752]
V.P.C. Amirshah & ors. v Salimabi [2007 KHC 3447] Avaran Koya v Mariyam [1993 (1) KLT 65]
Ahmed Khan V Shah Bano Begum & ors. [AIR 1985 SC 945]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.